cover of episode CAUGHT RED-HANDED! Kamala’s DIRTY Trick to MANIPULATE News EXPOSED + Monkeypox “EMERGENCY” Declared! - SF431

CAUGHT RED-HANDED! Kamala’s DIRTY Trick to MANIPULATE News EXPOSED + Monkeypox “EMERGENCY” Declared! - SF431

Publish Date: 2024/8/16
logo of podcast Stay Free with Russell Brand

Stay Free with Russell Brand

Chapters

Shownotes Transcript

Hello you awakening wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle, Gurgle Dot or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of

of lies and propaganda. We appreciate you and we love you. You're part of our community. So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble show five days a week. It's on Monday to Friday. We decipher the latest news stories. We break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering and if they aren't,

then we critique why they're not and what they are covering. Every week as well, right, we do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker, Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate. These things are already up and you can listen to them now. So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show. To tune in live, go to rumble.com forward slash Russell Brand. You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.

Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand. Thanks. Hello there you awakening wonders. Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand. And this is a day where freedom must be cherished as authoritarianism and bureaucracy insidiously claim yet more territory. We stand united.

as a glorious resistance. Surely we shall drink to freedom. And next year, the revolution will have taken place. Hey, Bongino Army supporters, we love you. You're welcome here always. You know there's been a truce between the Bongino Army and the Brandinis for some time now. And will similar truces be achieved across the world that we may unify and fight against the forces of globalism? Not that this isn't one globular spherical object.

floating uninsured through the infinite, so therefore surely there should be some solidarity among us and the maximum amount of control individually and communally. Not centralized authority, we should resist it wherever we see it. Peacefully, of course, peacefully.

If that's complicated, you might have been conditioned. Yeah, England is done, says Scott Hanna, 2022. They've gone full tyrannical. Let us ensure that...

that we remain free here and free wherever we can. As we know that the media is doing an astounding job in amplifying for globalism, amplifying for bureaucrats. And again, look, take, God, try to imagine if you could for a moment that you were a juror in a Trump trial. That is to say you're neutral on the subject of Trump because that's what every juror had to claim to be, right? Now, remember remarking at the time, who among us,

could be neutral on Trump or Kamala at this point when we've received such various infernos of propaganda from either side, you want to argue, because for surely I am suggesting that we achieve a position of neutrality. Who among us could claim that this propaganda war isn't hotting right up? For example, let's have a look at, before we get into this stuff,

Before we get into this stuff, let's look at some of those artifacts of propaganda, because our main focus today will be about how the media is ensuring you have a very particular perspective of the forthcoming American election, in particular, the candidate of Kamala Harris, who they want to be regarded in a high light. And indeed, to my earlier point, my...

Sympathy or open-mindedness towards Trump came not from anything that he said or anything he represents, no, but from the ongoing condemnation of the media class. I thought, if they hate him this much, there must be something about him that's significant. There must be. Indeed, anyone that they want you to hate is surely worth fighting.

thinking about again and we're going to have to put aside all of our hatred we're going to have to put aside all of our loathing we're going to have to find open-heartedness in ourselves and in one another if we're to be anything other than patsies rubes and dupes for their system

of condemnation if you're watching this right now on locals welcome you glorious community neon grammarian i welcome you lily farm girl how have you been enjoying our bible studies how have you been enjoying our meditations how are you enjoying our stand-up comedy analysis i love the

doing that stuff welcome thanks for joining us rumble john easily 6599 yeah praise jesus baby sold in 007 welcome to oh no i'm not going to say that oh nope steady steady sometimes the rumble chat can be pretty crazy but what i will say is free speech is thriving in there if you're watching us on youtube we'll be available for you for another 10 minutes because we we want you over here

come join us join us youtube is owned by google google is owned by alphabet alphabet is a massive donor to the political and institutional class ultimately they want to corral you into tiny minuscule hexagons of inanity that your consciousness be controlled we want to burst open that cellular structure

so that you can feel the new diaspora of freedom of which we are part. And I thank all of you for the compliments on my garments. And the simple truth is, yes, it is my wife's. I'm simply too lost in Christ to have time for it.

fussing over the wardrobe these days. I spent the morning in prayer with J. John. Do you know how J. John, do you know who J. John is? You're aware about J. John? We should be getting that guy on the show. Here's a message from the Kamala campaign.

that sounds like she's kind of campaigning against herself. But when Kamala campaigned, she campaigned good. She campaigned by disappearing. She campaigned by commandeering, commandeering Google space. For example, now you've noticed, of course, that their new adverts are meant to look like Google searches. We spoke to a brilliant Google expert. I think he was called Dr. Robert Epstein.

who, I know it's Epstein, everyone wants their names to not sound like, you know, it's either Jeffrey Epstein on one side and then there's Harvey Weinstein, Weinstein, you know, people are always having to change their Steens and Steins to get away from the, from the condemned ones. Let's have a look at this Kamala campaign. Kamala,

Kamala Harris has spent decades fighting violent crime. As a border state prosecutor, she took on drug cartels and jailed gang members for smuggling weapons and drugs across the border. As vice president, she backed the toughest border control bill in decades. And as president, she will hire... That's going to be one of those involuntary laugh moments, isn't it? Because was she a border czar? When is a border czar not a border czar? When does it become bizarre to claim that you were or weren't a border czar?

I don't know, I don't know, but it's like, you know, that will be one of those involuntary laugh moments where an audience now has become more discerning than the propagandists recognize. We'll be looking at that Colbert moment a little later where Colbert said to that CNN reporter,

You know, you guys are known for being neutral and the audience just laughed. That sound of laughter, that is the symphony of awakening. That is the symphony of our shared realization. That is us coming to understand that they are... It's so amazing, man. Sometimes I jump, I look over at the Rumble chat and

It's pretty good. It's pretty good. We need free speech. Yeah. Trump, all puppets. Then they're afraid to debate RFK. RFK is getting a lot of heat, a lot of heat. And we'll be covering that in some detail a little later. Excuse me. I'm just going through all of my varied documents. Hey, before we go too far.

I do a little shout out to our CEO of Rumble, Chris Pavlovsky, who's been talking about Dunkin' Donuts advertising. You know we're on Rumble. You know Rumble's a free speech place.

Let's have a look at, I just want to have a quick chat. Thanks, mate. I want to just check this out quickly. This is Pavlovsky, our CEO, talking about advertising because I suppose there are various cartels that handle advertising as well. Advertising is always a difficult thing, isn't it? But let's have a look. Hey, I'm Chris Pavlovsky, CEO of Rumble. We're a public company on the NASDAQ under ticker RUM. Today, I released a damning email from Dunkin' Donuts and Inspire Brands.

In that email, they discriminated against half the country by saying they will not advertise on any platform with right-wing culture. So I came home and I went in my drawer and look what I found. Dunkin' Donuts. And I have the honor of taking this little tray and dumping it, dunking it in the trash.

I have no tolerance for dunking donuts when they're going to discriminate against half of Americans. There they go, dunking donuts being dunked away. Extraordinary, isn't it? To see the way that different marketing forces and brands coalesce around particular political movements. There you go. Oh, I was thinking toilet. I would have dumped them, dump it. I think a good video, I mean, he should have called me for this. I could have given him some production design notes and some creative. I would have said, get the donuts.

store them internally, get a variety of colored like, you know, raspberry ones, chocolate ones, the regular vanilla color. And then if you're able to dilate on command, you could dump them donuts right out your butt. Now the problem is with the jelly filled, if you're a US audience, is that that could look like internal hemorrhaging and that might oversell the point. But that's just some advice on how to handle those kind of ideas.

We live in a media age that we are having to become acclimatized to. We're having to learn quickly to discern the false from the true, to recognize the many false prophets, to recognize that we live in the false Luciferian light, the post enlightenment condition where we're given so much information that truly we live in its flood, deluged with deceits and untruths. Here,

are some plain moments that you may enjoy. At a Kamala Harris rally, some of her supporters are invited to list her greatest achievements. The propaganda machine wants you to consider her as a prosecutor, where evidently she had some successes, certainly something they're keen to hark back

at although I've heard people say that there were pretty punitive sentences for people convicted of marijuana offences, that there were some people detained criminally due to a relationship that prison had with manufacturers that were using prison labour. So even that aspect of Kamala's career is somewhat murky and

in her position as vice president prior to the ascent of a media campaign that has the unification that we've seldom seen, but for perhaps in COVID or when they want us to go to war for something, she has been reframed.

as a figure of salvation around whom the left or what passes to the left these days or coalesce, whether it's the establishment left or the intellectual left, people seem pretty keen to support Kamala. But here are her supporters trying to summons up something positive to say. Let's have a look. I've not watched this yet. I'm excited to see it. - Today we're trying to find out from the attendees what Kamala Harris's greatest accomplishment has been at VP.

I mean, honestly, I'm not too into politics. I'm just here for the vibe. Becoming the first female vice president. So just becoming the VP is the best accomplishment? Yeah, absolutely. Being a good person. Being a good person? Yeah. I mean, she's, I don't know.

Harris is there with the energy. She has a lot of enthusiasm so it's important to get behind her. What is Kamala's top accomplishment you think?

I couldn't say anything right now. Give me a second. Her top contributions to policy or policy as VP. I wasn't in on the policy making decisions with President Biden. So I don't know. Her favorite policies. Oh my gosh. See, I wish they would tell us more about that because I honestly don't know.

Um, oh, I know she's done some good work with immigration, even though they say opposite. What do they say? Well, what is it? She's the border czar. The fake border czar. And it's her fault that all these immigrants are coming over, you know, to cross the border right now, which I don't think they are.

People have been saying that Kamala's the border czar, whatever that means. Is there an issue at the border? Has Kamala done anything about it? Or was there not anything to do about it? And so they're just kind of making things up. So I don't think there's an issue with the border at all. Yeah, I feel like, yes, illegal immigrants are coming to America, but that's what America is all about.

is to come to America and live that American dream because America isn't just for the whites it's not just for the blacks it's not just for the Mexicans no it's for everyone around the world we're supposed to be a country of letting people come in and do what they'd like I mean I understand that with they say the border crisis is causing all these drug issues and it's causing crime but

In my opinion, there's crime everywhere. You can go to New York, you can go to Canada, you can go anywhere across the world and there's going to be crime regardless. Yeah, it's a total, they're billing it way out of proportion, huh? No, for sure. Would you say there's a problem at the border at all? So, there is a problem at the border. I really would wish for her to go visit the border while she's here. I don't know what's on her schedule.

whatnot, but I mean there's work to do and I can't dismiss that. There's problems to fix, but my personal wish would be for her to visit the border with the governor so they could see what's going on.

Nice, that's fantastic stuff. It's, I suppose, is a clear indicator that we live in a time of vacuity where even ardent attendees of a rally are unable to say why they support a particular candidate. And I reckon that's how they want us. Lost in delirium, trapped in emotion, only able to offer invective and fury.

or hollow rhetoric rather than saying, I believe this candidate is going to be good for my community and good for my family. Did you see that policy about how they're going to enable our community to be granted an entire budget and vote which bits we give to schools, which bits we give to hospitals, which bit we donate, kick upstairs to defence, how we manage our own migration. We're going to say that our community can take this number of migrants that would have

to be registered in this way and participate in our community in this way. And this is how we believe the borders should be used. That is why I so enjoyed meeting Fidius, who the dude from Cyprus who's become a member of the European Parliament, who through transparency tells you how the EU works. And if you don't know how the EU works, then surely you'll be interested that Ursula von der Leyen, who's just been voted back into her position of uber superiority, conducted private conversations with Albert Bolling,

Ebola CEO of Pfizer made orders of vaccines that ultimately turned out to be not 100% successful. And an interesting wrinkle is that her husband, you'll be astonished to learn, works in the pharmaceutical industry and received some of those contracts himself.

There is so much room for transparency. There is so much room for information. In an age where people tell you, like the Democrat party establishment will tell you, misinformation has to be controlled. Look at their supporters, uninformed, misinformed, delirious, bewildered, and unable to appoint even a single reason to vote for a candidate that they vociferously support and support through their attendance of that event.

Staggering! Extraordinary! At very least, surprising! Guys, if you're an Awaken Wonder and a Locals member, are you enjoying seeing our stand-up breakdowns? Made by me and Massey, one of our editors. We work very hard here in this little team. Check that stuff out. Let me know in the Locals chat, @MOTEO28 and @SensitiveHearts25 if you like that. And let me know what you think of the John Rich conversation. How I loved chatting to that guy.

He is pretty passionate about his Christianity. It was an extraordinary chat. I loved it. Let me know what you think. Hey, listen, you guys, we've got a brilliant breakdown of the Kamala Harris campaign and the way that the media are working. And when I say media, I don't just mean legacy media, print, television. I mean, online media, too. And indeed, the manipulation that's taking place in techno spaces, stalking.

Start the YouTube countdown, would you guys? Because this stuff's going to be too spicy for a media establishment that participates in that kind of propaganda. We're going to show you exactly how it's been pieced together and even show you some extraordinary footage of Donald Trump prior to his candidacy and how he was approached with something akin to affection by that oft-affected

excited coven of loathing the view. We'll also be looking at Bobby Kennedy and the kind of heat and hate he receives from the establishment. So click that link in the description, join us on Rumble and let's speak freely and unite. Before we jump into that, and I've got so much more to tell you about, actually, I've got some lovely stuff on more because let's not forget that the apocalypse is encroaching. Let's have a look at, let's have a little message from our sponsors, partners and friends over at Fume.

Fume, delicious Fume. My favorite flavor is orange vanilla. All the flavors are non-toxic, bit like herbal teas. That's my favorite one there, orange vanilla. This alternative helps you kick your bad habit in an enjoyable way without nicotine. Fume, don't just serve you or me, but 300,000 customers. You can be their next success story. For a limited time, use my code RUSSELBRAND for your free topper, the perfect accessory to your Fume device.

Slip it onto the mouthpiece for a softer, warmer feel. Grow up. It's chewable for those of you who like to fidget orally and reusable. How many things can you say that about? Chewable but also reusable. Head to tryfume.com. That's tryfume.

F U M use the code RUSSELBRAND, two S's and two L's or scan the QR code on your screen right now to get your free fume topper when you order your journey pack today. Chewable fume. It's the age we live in, baby. Thank you fume for sponsoring this video. Lafarious monster, you're back. Those fit up the ass quite nice. Oh, I see. You meant the fume. I thought there was a shot of me wearing like jeans or tight pants and I was like...

Leferis Monster was complimenting my ass, but of course you're saying that the fume item could be used in a different capacity and Leferis Monster it's nice to have you back and I assume you're still locked in the tension between what seems to be a sexuality that's somewhat adventurous, let's say charitably, and a yearning for an experience with a higher being that could transform you and I can tell you now there is one available to you. Now listen!

Be scared! Why? What is it this... What today would you like me to be scared of? Well, I don't know, monkeypox? Not another virus, not yet. We're not ready for another... Like, you know how they have crisis on shuffle? You know, it's going to be a war. There's going to be some sort of riot. There's going to be... Is it time for another global pandemic?

Not yet. You've barely used up the last one. Well, the WHO think they can get away with another pandemic. Monkeypox, not a good brand, not a good name. Silly, laughable, ridiculous. I hereby predict confidently that people will refuse to be locked in their house because of monkeypox. Monkeypox sounds silly. COVID-19, it sounded sort of science-y, didn't it? COVID-19.

We were able to look over the fact that they'd gamed it out prior, that there had been patents for vaccines years earlier. We can overlook the rise of the turbo cancers and the heart diseases and vertigo and the various neurological conditions that seem to be on the rise, the sudden rise in cancer in young people. All of this

All of this we can overlook, all of the errors of the lockdown, all of the lies and the profiting and the authoritarianism. But don't you try and monkey pox us where it hurts. Not yet. Don't you do it. Don't you dare try and monkey pox us yet. The World Health Organization tonight is declaring MPOX, formerly known as monkey pox, a global public health emergency.

Could we call it MPOX? Monkeypox is stupid. People won't take it seriously because of a monkey. People like monkeys. Monkeys are fun. MPOX? Could we call it MPOX? The virus is now rapidly spreading across Africa. Cases have been detected in more than a dozen countries. Most of them in the Democratic Republic of the Congo with more than 14,000 cases there. 524 deaths this year alone. Here at home,

home, the CDC is urging doctors and the public to be alert for signs of the virus, including fever, muscle aches, swollen lymph nodes. And get inside your house when we tell you are some of the symptoms of impacts, even breaking down the name of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. If you were to

investigate the history of that mineral rich wealthy territory its complexity the conflicts that have been stoked and inspired the exploitation that has taken place the careful insertion of both democrat and republic into his name when i'll take a wild guess and say that the regime there are favorable in one way or another to the kind of interest that previously would have benefited from imperialism or colonialism whether that had been under the belgians or the

British or America. Ah, surely the day will come where we will not yield to monkeypox, mpox, cat in a hat, fox in socks, made-up diseases, ridiculous pleas for endless tyranny, but we'll unite and demand something resembling democracy together. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think, guys? We care what you believe in, don't we? We have to. One man who

He's never afraid to voice his opinion. One man who stands noble and tall, maybe not literally, I've not taken the time to measure him, but when it comes to being outspoken, you love him because of his Golden Globes monologues. You may love him because of his comedy series. You may love him because in rhetoric he has remained true to his origins. Ricky Gervais has throughout

his various fame incarnations just a true a comedy and true to hitting out all against hypocrisy whenever he's considered it to be necessary and relevant i've not watched this yet i'm pretty excited to see it this is ricky gervais talking about politics i guess he's talking a little bit about brit oh i'm so sorry i'm i thought i had an olympic style nip slip there why do they keep doing that a major remember those the super bowl there was a nip slip

At the Olympics it's a nut slip and now no further slips, just the sweet truthful lips of Ricky Gervais condemning politics. Let us rest for a while in Ricky Gervais's invective. You've got to have rules. Unless you're the prime minister. Political satire. I don't get political. I feel like it though.

I'm getting angrier and holding it all in more and more. Even live I don't really get political. I think I've been naive. I've hit that age where I go, "Well they're all fucking lying, shitty little fucking corrupt twats." It was just lying in their own part. And I just think, I didn't really, I don't think I, I think there were, I think I thought there was good guys and bad guys, but

Now I just think they're all little fucking shit. Is that political? Is that some really nuanced insight into the workings of society? Greedy little fucking posh twat. Good, that's why I don't get political.

Amazing. I love him. I think they should allow people to run for Senate or occupy Parliament or Congress, but that Ricky Gervais should give the opening speeches instead of the grandeur of the King turning up or whatever you do over in your country with the Speaker of the House.

have Ricky Gervais out there for 10, 15 minutes doing a Golden Globe style takedown. And then you can get on with taking lobbyists' money and investing in companies that you benefit from or doing PPE deals at the height of a pandemic. These are all

actual examples. Thank God for Ricky Gervais and I'm aware of his position on that matter. You gotta love Ricky, you love Ricky, let me know in the comments and the chat. While we're talking about the ongoing media furore and propaganda campaign that surrounds the ascendancy of Kamala Harris, you know that there are still wars on, you know that there are still parades, Taliban parades made up of

Well, there's no nice way of saying it. Weapons that were left there by the botched departure, augured and augmented by Joe Biden. Remember that guy blown away from the dust of history? Did he resign? Did he resign? What amendment was evoked? How come Kamala Harris... Was there an election for Kamala Harris? Was she endorsed? What are the policies? Does she do press conferences? Does she do interviews? So many questions. But...

don't we just love instead of policy an enjoyable parade here's a taliban parade in afghanistan where 85 billion dollars worth of military uh equipment is on display it was left there by the biden and kamala harris administration but you know parade's a parade and maybe it's not the macy's christmas day parade but it's still enjoyable

-

good job of learning how to use that equipment, haven't they? They've really adjusted over there in the Taliban to like those tanks. They're all, that's American taxpayer tanks, is it? That's all staff like, where did you get that tank? Well, actually, I don't like to see people, like imagine if you gave something to a charity shop or, you know, and like then you saw someone else wearing it. Like if I gave this to a charity shop, and I never would because I adore this garment.

But if I saw someone subsequently wearing it, I think I'd really question my original charity. Now, if this had been left by Kamala Harris and Joe Biden somewhere in Afghanistan, and then I saw people do it in a parade, I think I would feel agitated. And, you know, you can't do too much damage with this beautiful garment. And with some of those tanks, they do look very efficient. I mean, I don't know what they're doing over there at Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, etc. But they do make some pretty fine military equipment. And I should clarify, they're not a sponsor.

The

music's actually quite beautiful it's very beautiful piece of propaganda albeit rather expensively achieved at the expense of the american taxpayer there are still weapons making their way out into the world apparently pariah saudi arabia are doing some pretty good

deals for offensive weaponry with the United States government. I do remember that Joe Biden, hey, forget that guy, he's gone like old skin cells, like

like his own memory, just distant. It's Kamala Harris now, can you stay with it? It's like a trend. What is it? Is it like Pogs or Pokemon Go or whatever? People don't bother with pop stars now, do they? The culture can't accommodate them. Regardless, the fact is that promises of yesterday are of as much value as Joe Biden's memories. Saudi Arabia are being sold weapons now. As tensions with Iran increase in the region,

The United States has agreed to resume selling offensive weapons to Saudi Arabia. In 2021, the Biden administration placed an arms embargo on the Saudi kingdom after accusing Riyadh of human rights violations in the war against the Yemen-based Houthis. However, Washington says that Riyadh remains one of its most dependable allies in the region.

Citing bureaucratic hurdles, diplomatic procedures, and geopolitical considerations, the United States will now sell precision-guided bombs and missiles to Saudi Arabia.

Oh no! Mind you, I mean, civil rights and human rights violations are getting pretty common. And me, as a person living in the UK, I can hardly condemn any other regimen for being authoritarian or violating human rights. And thank God I'm on Rumble, or I wouldn't even be able to say that without potentially being jailed. So, there you have it. Hey! Did you- But that's just what I think, guys. Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat. Now...

Data and polls are seldom reliable, but CNN have a guy that I enjoy that's very enthusiastic about them. We're going to get into the Kamala Harris campaign and the 360 fully immersive propaganda campaign that we're all currently enjoying. There's the kind of thing.

of campaign in fact that accompanied the pandemic. You cannot criticize, you must not condemn, we're only interested in hearing one side of the argument, we're being vague about science and even what science constitutes. For now though, let's have a look at a CNN data reporter dealing with inaccuracies when it comes to polling data. I like this guy and he likes polling. Grop, don't be dirty.

In those states I mentioned, those Great Lake battleground states, Trump was underestimated by nine points on average at this point in 2016. How about 2020? It wasn't a one-off. Look at this. He was underestimated by five points on average. And of course, Kamala Harris's advantage in those New York Times, Siena College polls were four points in each of these key battleground states, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The bottom line is this. If you have any idea, if you're a Kamala Harris fan and you want to rip

open the champagne bottle, pop that cork. Do not do it. Donald Trump is very much in this race. If we have a polling shift like we've seen in prior years from now until the final result, Donald Trump would actually win. I'm not saying that's going to happen, but I am saying that he is very much in this ballgame based upon where he is right now and compare that to where he was in prior years. We certainly heard the Harris campaign saying we have to keep fighting. Absolutely. This is definitely not over. All right. Let's talk

about enthusiasm and how that translates actually. We are quite a ways out again, three months about.

Yeah. You know, you yesterday I was mentioning, you know, the enthusiasm for the Democratic ticket was up. But that enthusiasm is not the same thing as going out to actually vote. And there's a different question, which essentially says, how certain are you actually going to go out and vote? And this is the top range, almost certain to vote again, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. This is among registered voters. Look at this. Look at Kamala Harris now compared to where Joe Biden was back in May.

In fact, 62% of Joe Biden voters said they were almost certain to turn down a vote. Now, it's actually gone down a little bit. I would call this in the same general area at 61%.

But it's basically unchanged. And look at Donald Trump. He was at 58% in May. He's actually gone up a little bit now. He's at 60% now. Again, basically no real change. So the bottom line here is yes, there may be more enthusiasm for Kamala Harris, but the fact is we're not seeing that necessarily translate in the almost certain vote. And one little other note, Sarah, I will note this. Donald Trump is more popular today than he was on August 13th in either 2020 or 2016. So the bottom line is yes.

Kamala Harris is doing better in the polls, but there's a long way to go. The polls can shift. The almost certain to vote hasn't actually shifted. And Donald Trump is more popular than he was at either 2016 or 2020 at this point.

Sorry about that. I've got all that time to swallow and chose the very wrong, the least favourable moment to deal with some saliva. Klaus Schwab-like move that was of the many things you may have noticed about Klaus Schwab. Perhaps you didn't consider the thought of gargoyles while he speaks. I kind of miss that guy.

Interesting to see that this still qualifies, I would say, as propaganda. It's a fear-based piece of propaganda to invite the CNN audience to galvanize people to vote, I would say, is the function of that piece of propaganda. Don't, because of polling, become complacent, I would say, is the message there. It's to mobilize.

Ah, okay, okay. Hey, let's have a look at this. Some of Kamala Harris's... One of the things about the Kamala Harris campaign is that she has become invisible. She has become, in a sense, the true inheritor of Biden's mantle in so much as she is invisible.

untraceable. It's difficult to know what she stands for, what she believes in. Even ardent Democrats, people that as yet still believe in this system, can't point to a Medicare or a new Green Deal, whether you like these policies or not, they are at least policies. And here, a CNN reporter, stroke propagandist, one might imagine, but although he is asking a challenging question in this instance, asks, would it kill you guys to have a press conference? Let's have a look at that.

Would it kill you guys to have a press conference? Why hasn't she had a press conference? Listen, the Vice President and Governor Walz have been busy crisscrossing this country since the launch of this campaign and adding Governor Walz to the ticket. You saw the ways in which they went across the battleground states last week, generating rallies of thousands, 10,000 here, 15,000 there.

But Michael, you know a campaign rally is not a press conference. Do you mind if I cut in? I mean, you know, a campaign rally is not a press conference. Why hasn't she had a press conference? She's the vice president. She can handle the questions. Why not do it?

We absolutely are going to do it. You hear her take questions as she's out on the stump. And she's she said last week, we're going to be having a sit down interview here before the end of the month. What she's going to be focused on and what this campaign is going to be focused on is communicating directly with the voters that are actually going to decide the pathway to 270 electoral votes. That's why she can commit to a press conference this week, this past week.

That's why we're doing a bus tour in Pennsylvania as we head into Chicago. And it's why we'll sit down for an interview before the end of the month to make sure that we can have a deep dive conversation about the vision that Kamala Harris has for where she wants to take this country in the contrast that we're going to have with Donald Trump. We're going to have plenty of opportunities to do that.

throughout the rest of this campaign. I don't want to, you know, belabor this, but one interview before the end of the month. I mean, that's not a lot. I mean, can you commit to a press conference before the end of the month? We will commit to directly engage with the voters that are actually going to decide this election. And that is going to be complete with rallies, with sit-down interviews, with press conferences, with all the digital assets that we have at our disposal. Strategy.

and the manipulation of information, the curation of a reality that becomes impermeable and is impossible for us to interact with, sometimes even impossible for us to understand. The authenticity and integrity that may once have been a component of politics has entirely disappeared. That might be evident from even that brief

dialogue there. But it certainly becomes plain when you look at the way that this campaign is continuing to unfold. Let's look now in some depth

at the way that the media machine is supporting the Kamala Harris campaign. There are many components to this. There's the smearing and condemnation of alternatives. There's the bolstering and amplification of Kamala Harris as a candidate. There is the manipulation of media. So old media, new media, galvanization of the voter base. And extraordinarily, an intention it seems to make Kamala Harris a kind of

phantom figure that they recognize it seems that the election is theirs to lose from the advent of Trump aside from his 2016 victory it has been assumed that the best way to oppose him is to stay out of his way and to focus on negatively condemning Donald Trump not to rely on the candidate who's opposing him but to instead

allow a kind of inertia and momentum of fear to gather around the figure of Trump, who's already been sort of demonized to an outrageous degree, to the point where you sort of forget that there was a time where Donald Trump was just regarded as a kind of

Celebrity. He wasn't seen as a sort of a threat and as a menace and as a pseudo strongman 21st century Hitler. He was regarded as a kind of celebrity. Now Joe Rogan picked up on that and showed a bit of footage of Trump appearing on The View prior to the announcement of his candidacy. And it's really interesting just to note how he was dealt with.

We're going to look at that first of all, then we're going to look at how they handle RFK, and then we're going to look as well at the fact that we're becoming more literate, far from falling for misinformation and disinformation and therefore needing more authoritarian protection in the form of censorship. We're becoming so adept

so discerning that we are learning a spot bullshit a mile away as Stephen Colbert's audience demonstrated a little while ago. But let's have a look at how it was not ever thus. There was a time where Trump could appear on The View and it's kind of convivial, jolly almost, before he was required to be a kind of demonic,

bogeyman of the left. Let's have a look at this appearance on The View. Hey, everybody used to like Trump. Like the show. You ever seen like videos of Trump on The View with Barbara Walters back when they liked him? You ever seen that?

Yes, but I can't remember what you're referring to. You should see it because it's bonkers. This is it. Watch this. This is bonkers. Go full screen. This is literally bonkers. He's a real estate mogul and a television star. But does he really want to add president of the United States to his resume? A lot of people would like him to. Please let's find out. And please welcome my friend, Donald Trump. My friend. My friend. Watch this. Just watch this. This is nuts. We're in an alternative universe. Okay? Because this is not that long ago.

go standing oh bro watch this just watch how this goes watch this so she's a republican that's easy yeah but everybody else joy can't wait to get a hug in yeah everyone's hugging look at this look at this kisses hugs kisses to whoopie everybody hugs and kisses even joy behar hugs and kisses see now watch this so i'm going to take you at your word that you have not really

ought be the other way around. A more viable, appealing and attractive universe would be one where he was once demonized and vilified and then one day in the future the cast of The View welcomed him and you had the sense of unity and togetherness and a falling away of all of the cruel and inky language spilled

a kind of reconciliation. Do any of us benefit from all of this invective and hate? Are any of us in any way having our lives or understanding of politics improved by all of this hatred and loathing? We'll get into this in a little more detail. First, a message from one of our partners and sponsors from some pretty credible doctors, Peter McCulloch and some of his colleagues there over at the Wellness Company. See you in a second.

I read reviews from brands I partner with. This five-star review about the Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit really stood out. The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit helps you manage when traditional medical help is out of reach. Where is it? Where is it? I can't reach it. It comes with eight proven medications, including Z-Pak, amoxicillin, doxycyllin, and ivermectin, and an approved guidebook, making self-care straightforward and effective.

One of these kits is like having urgent care ready when you need it right in the comfort of your own home or hovel. Get your medical emergency kit from the wellness company today. Be prepared for whatever comes your way. You can do that how? This way. Head to twc.health forward slash brand and use the code brand to save money.

$30. That's TWC.health forward slash brands. Use the code brand to save $30 plus free shipping today. I pray it's available where you need it. Thank you.

It becomes yet more clear that there are benefits to our despair, benefits to our opposition of one another. Let's enjoy a trip down memory lane when Trump was still a person that could happily go on The View and chat with Joy Baha and Whoopi Et al. You haven't decided yet when you're going to run, but you're thinking about it and you've expressed some of your views, which are controversial.

and in many ways, yeah, but-- - Not to her. - Well, not to her. Okay, you're a Republican, so, but let's say-- - Point by point. - Let's say that you do decide in the spring, right? And your ideas resonate so much. On the other hand,

You know, we saw Newt Gingrich apologizing for his marriages and divorces. You've had three marriages, two sort of uncomfortable divorces. Do you think that the... Not really. They were very comfortable. Well, we want to hear all that. Do you think... Getting laughs right away. That would bother anybody?

I think the country is doing so badly, they want somebody that's going to help it. I think the country has never been in a position like it is right now. It's being ripped off by every nation, every intelligent nation in the world, whether it's China, they're taking our jobs, they're making all our product, and then they loan us back the money we pay them interest. That is crazy. Whether it's OPEC. That is crazy. OPEC, which is out of the field day right now. How

- How about the Arab League? They say, "We want you to go in and attack Libya. "These are the wealthiest countries in the world." Why aren't they paying us? - Then they change their minds also. - No, I did answer your question. I really think people-- - You think it won't matter. - I think maybe 10 years ago it would have mattered, five years ago it-- - Yeah. - The fact is, I think people want somebody now that's gonna protect them and protect this country, 'cause we're not gonna be a great country for long if we keep going the way we're going right now. - The audience cheers.

When we have France, France leading the charge, okay? France, this is our new leader. By the way, they led for about two hours. After that, nobody's seen them. I don't know if you know that. Let me just ask a follow-up question to that. Let's say you run.

You've given a lot of thought for this. Who would you like as your vice president? Possibly Sarah Palin? Well, I think it's far too early even to discuss that. I'm going to make a decision sometime prior to June. I'm thinking about it very strongly. I think I'd do a really good job. I think I'd protect this country like it's not being protected. Now, it's funny. So many of the things I say, now politicians are saying, hey, that's right.

Why aren't they paying us? If you look at North Korea, South Korea, we're protecting South Korea. They're making a fortune. Let's call it hundreds of billions of dollars of profit on us. We have 25,000 soldiers over there protecting them. They don't pay us. Why are they paying us? - You'd be treating this like a business. - No, no, a business with heart. Believe me. - Brilliant. In a way, a parallel universe where conviviality and conversation were possible.

And he was talking about some trade embargoes and tariffs and the kind of jingoistic and somewhat aggressive rhetoric that defines Trump as a political figure. So you can't claim that it's the ideas for which Trump is being condemned. It is reality.

because of what he represents, or perhaps more accurately yet, because he is an aberration, an interruption in institutional power. You lot who watch our show know me, I'm not like a MAGA guy. My concerns are mostly about systemic and institutional corruption and how decentralized power would be a pathway for all of us and a

offer us an opportunity for truce amidst endless opposition. But what's clear to me is that the establishment hate Trump for a reason. And that reason isn't because they want to protect you. It isn't because of their own principles and values. It will be because of self-service and

the ability to maintain power structures that benefit them, whether that's the professional media class or whether it's institutions and organizations that are perhaps a little more esoteric and more difficult to discern. Let's have a look at how the world treats Trump now. Let's have a look at how media bias functions in 2024 in the lead up to a presidential election where there are

are already only two parties with a of course a necessary mention of Bobby Kennedy who believes that if he were able to debate he would make a significant impact and I know that many of you will say that on some issues Bobby Kennedy still has views that are to be found within the establishment let's have a look first of all at how

Legacy Media treats the two candidates as these two Time covers. It's pretty clear that there's a position being offered by Time magazine. It's hardly surprising that that's their position. But what I think is worthy of note and encouraging, and again, I say this as a man who don't have a dog in the fight, who doesn't vote in your country, and who believes in political systems that are somewhat ascendant of what we're being offered by any existing political entity,

that seeing a live audience refuse to take the crack as they're being flipped by the emcees of the establishment, by the amplifiers of the message is encouraging indeed. You perhaps have already seen this moment where the Colbert audience laughs out

loud at the idea that CNN are neutral. We are becoming awakened and aware of what the function of the media is, that it's owned by a handful of interests and that it ultimately exists to support the establishment agenda. That could be whether or not there are public disturbances in my country or whether there are political movements that are antithetical to their intentions in yours or whether

there's a global pandemic from the local to the global, the legacy media is not your friend. If they want you to hate someone, welcome that person. If they want you to like someone, be deeply cynical and suspicious about that person. I've been in both roles and I know what I represented across the line of their loathing. When I was a member of the establishment,

somewhat curious about spirituality, always cynical about establishment power, but willing to enjoy its incredible fruits as part of the Hollywood establishment, I too was enjoyed and formed over. But the minute I began to say, "Hey, there's something I don't like about these systems. There's something about this that we cannot trust."

then I experience their ire. I experience their condemnation. But thankfully, we are awakening and we're awakening fast. And there's no greater indicator of awakening than the sound of laughter. True liberation.

Trump has kind of been thrown on his heels by this and he's not really sure how to go after Vice President Harris. He knew his attack lines on President Biden. He really has struggled with how to go after someone who's 20 years younger than him, who is a different gender, a different race. It's kind of been this moment where he has not been able to coalesce around a single attack line.

I know you guys are objective over there that you just report the news as it is. Oh, I know, CNN makes a... Is that supposed to be a laugh line? It wasn't supposed to be, but I guess it is. Listen to Musk or regard Musk's comment. He enjoyed it. And of course, he's delighted because we've just had a billion views on X of his conversation with Trump. So we're seeing, I suppose, a more obvious fissure and break emerge between

legacy media and social media that is controlled and co-opted and still somewhat independent social media. Elon Musk, many of you have critiques and condemnation abundantly for him. But what you can say is that how X was prior to Musk's proprietorship was much more in alignment with meta and alphabet.

and how those platforms were managed and controlled. Obvious examples being what was permissible to be discussed or stated during the pandemic period and the Hunter Biden laptop story and the evident and now demonstrable infiltration of deep state agencies like the FBI and CIA. Again, my argument without even touching on what Trump represents, even though I must say as a

public speaker, I enjoy him a great deal. The clear thing is the establishment do not want him in power. And again, I'm very sympathetic to those of you that say that either of the candidates, Kamala Harris or Donald Trump, will still ultimately end up being in control. Clearly there's a preference when it comes to the establishment. Now where this war is fought out is of course in

in the realm of information. Bless us, our boreal creatures that we may yet be sprinkled with divinity. We'll believe too easily that which is laying before us. And if you look online and see, oh, well, Kamala Harris seems to be universally adored, we'll accept it. Here's the right side of, and I mean right wing side of Legacy Media covering Kamala Harris campaigns, clever.

but deceptive use of adverts that look like Google searches. We've already spoken in some depth to Robert Epstein, who says for some time, Google has been favoring pro-dem posts and search results while masking the opposing view.

This is already being, this is being now significantly added to by the Kamala Harris campaign that are placing ads that are deliberately designed to look just like the headlines you would find in an ordinary search. So you have the robust, full-throated, wholehearted support of that aspect of the establishment. And then you have the insidious stitches of digital manipulation. And we would have to say clever online campaigning

to add to it. Here it is being covered on Fox. - The Harris campaign accused of manipulating headlines. Axios reporting the campaign is giving real news articles a pro-Kamala Harris spin and then using them in Google ads. The trick was, we'll make it like an ad.

and we'll reframe the headline so that when you're searching, maybe you see the spot and you read the headline, but maybe you don't understand that it's actually sponsored by the campaign. Show it, guys. Here we go. So this would involve what? They cited CNN, NPR, Reuters, Associated Press, The Guardian a lot. And you would see this as you were going through your internet search. And well, that's cheating. Wow, it is. This is really...

I should also point out that Google says that there was a glitch in their system that meant that some of the sort of barriers that they try to put in to make it clear what this is weren't working. Oops. I wonder if it was true for

campaigns as well. We don't know that yet, but they say they're looking into that. But just as an example, so this is a Guardian headline: "VP Harris fights abortion bans. Harris defends reproductive freedom." Well, those things are true. That's a factual statement. That's something that she backs and supports. But

But then they have a description under the headline. So you know how there's a headline when you read a news story, then there's like an under headline that you read in the news story. But it says this: "VP Harris is a champion for reproductive freedom and will stop Trump's abortion bans." So the second line in what looks like a news story is actually a campaign slogan, a campaign statement.

We all look at so much information taken so many things so quickly throughout the day, right? This is very subtle very manipulative and in a moment when you also have a stepped-up threat from Iran trying to get their bots into all of this and influence people in ways that are very subtle and difficult to figure out and

This is something that I think requires a lot of diligence on the part of people who are looking for this information. And Google says it's just what, they got one by the goalie? Yeah, Google says, well, there was a glitch. There's supposed to be more disclosure that this is an ad, a campaign ad. And they're going to work on that.

Hmm, interesting. Because even though it says like it's an advert, it's still pretty deceptive and misleading, isn't it? And I suppose more and more we have to be aware of the information that we are presented with. What would you propose? That a government that is

overtly campaigning for more ability to censor and control information that you have access to or be behaving responsibly when they present you with information that it should be playing this as a campaign. I paid for this message. I endorsed this message. That kind of old school rhetoric that used to surround campaign content. It's very interesting that

On one hand, we're presented with the idea that we are unable to discern true information from false information. And elsewhere, they deploy campaign techniques that are deliberately deceptive, somewhat comparable, you might argue, to the Piper technique.

campaign that became famous when they suspected that MAGA and Trump style candidates would be unfavorable even among moderate Republican voters. So put Democrat campaign money behind the campaigns of Republican candidates that they regarded to be incendiary or unappealing.

What extraordinary deception goes on in the name of truth and authenticity? Contrast that with the kind of sort of pie-eyed wonder and lack of discernment that defined the Vox Popped Kamala campaign supporters earlier there who couldn't even come up

with something that Kamala Harris believed in. Is she a Bordasar? Is she not a Bordasar? Speaking even about reproductive health, where I figure that the Trump-Vance position is let the states decide, claiming that Trump wants control over reproductive health seems disingenuous. Again, it seems that we're in for a presidential campaign where he's steering

around the capacities and intentions of Trump. And I say capacities because the American constitution and institutions of government, if they're worth anything, should present someone marching unopposed into despotism and intention because he ain't said anything other than the odd joke that suggests that he would be interested in that. And I'm,

What I mean is, is when he said there'll be a bloodbath, he was talking about tariffs. When he said dictate it for a day, he was sort of joking about drilling in the wall. So what I would say to you is that if there is concern about misinformation, don't engage in misinformation. Let's have a look at this in a little more depth with this article.

Kamala Harris's presidential campaign has been running Google ads just like many others. The only problem her campaign is deliberately making it look like news outlets like the Guardian, NPR, Reuters and AP USA Today and Time are on her side by running ads designed to look like flattering headlines in addition to the propaganda that they're already providing. I've noticed how many establishment intellectual lefties are sort of fully behind Kamala Harris. No one's saying

And indeed the other globalist candidates and leaders, like the globalist authoritarians that run my country now, enjoy the support of the left because there is this sort of willingness to embrace the idea that this is the lesser of two evils. Wasn't that the whole Biden campaign? That Trump is so awful, we have to have Biden. And isn't this campaign, once again, Trump is so awful. And aren't we being invited again and again to...

quake in continual terror that some demonic force will take over if we don't entrust our nations and our planet to these bureaucrats who don't seem to me to have any real ideals or real care for ordinary people. Whether it's for complex social geographic reasons or for the ascent of AI and technology, it's clear that the professional media class that once had

at least a conversational affiliation with working people now condemn them and look for further reasons to continue to condemn them with the word racist almost being a synonym for working class these days let's look in more detail axios first reported this and noted that former president donald trump's campaign had not done the same so trump's campaign's not using these type of ads although you know maybe they will because it looks like it's working

With this practice repeatedly condemned as one that spreads misinformation. Though the practice does not technically violate Google's policies, with a spokesperson saying sponsored content is easily distinguishable from search results, it looks shockingly deceptive. We all saw it then, and we all saw that the intention is to deceive. And while we're in the midst of a giddy maelstrom of apparent censorship around misinformation,

Why would a presidential campaign be engaging in propaganda that is deliberately deceptive, fascinating, almost as if there are no principles, there are no values, almost as if the world has already been captured by a dark ideology and that only we as individuals through the true embrace of real principles can oppose them.

"Though the ads include links to real articles "from the news outlets, the headlines and supporting texts "have been altered to read as though the articles "support the Harris campaign's objectives," notes Axios. "Spokespeople for brands such as CNN, USA Today, and NPR, "whose links appeared in Harris for present ads, "said they were unaware their brand "was being featured in this way."

and an unconvincing response from the culprits themselves. A source familiar with the Harris campaign ads team said the campaign buys search ads with news links to give voters searching for information about Vice President Harris more context. We just want to give you the context where we can resume control over your consciousness digitally, your ideology through propaganda and all aspects of your freedom.

patronizingly telling you that we believe in truth. What an extraordinary campaign, what a bizarre cult the globalists operate, what an incredible opportunity we have individually and collectively to peacefully oppose them. Do we recognize yet that the

Hold on a second. Harken, that's a CIA chopper. It's landing on the premises. Hey, you knew we were broadcasting from the UK. It's been great. Let's get the bracelets on and get out of here, baby. Nope, they seem to have moved on. Maybe Edward Snowden or Julian Assange were drifting around nearby. Maybe there's a protest somewhere that doesn't bear the right inflections. So I would say this to you.

Be bloody discerning about the information that you read, but trust higher principles. Trust yourself. Trust the deep alliances that we can form one another. And never trust the establishment. Ever. Who they tell you to loathe, be open-hearted to. Who they tell you to, like, treat with extreme suspicion. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat. Thanks for joining us, you awakened wonders. Remember, there is abundant content available for you there.

and brilliant and fantastic. You can watch the Ed Byrne stand up. You can watch the John Rich interview. Man, that guy's pretty serious about Christianity. Tomorrow, we are covering in more detail Prison Project UK. How are we going to break out of this chaos? Even Amnesty International have decided that we need intervention. We've got to

get out of here. If you love us and you're across the waters, remember the UK is in need of your age. See you tomorrow, not for more of the same. We'd never insult you with that, but with more of the different. Until then, if you can, stay free.