Why don’t we eat people? 01:01:13

Hello. Before we begin this week, if you've been enjoying the show, I wanted to ask you to consider becoming a paid subscriber. There's a link in the show notes. Last month, we did a Q3 Zoom board meeting with paid subscribers. Basically, we took questions, we provided answers, we wildly overshared our audience numbers and some of our show financials. We wore suits, there was a PowerPoint. It was a lot of fun.

We are now planning our next event for paid subscribers. It's going to be an in-person happy hour here in New York City. Cash bar. Don't get excited. But we are also planning events in other cities as well. Anyway, head to the link in the show notes for more details. And if you want to, sign up to support the show. Okay, on with the show. Welcome to Surge Engine. Each week, we answer a question we have about the world. No question too big, no question too small. This week, why don't we eat people?

That's after some ads.

Roe has compounded GLP-1s in stock now. You can get it in one to four days if you qualify. Roe members have support throughout the process. If eligible for medication, patients have access to their provider on demand for any questions. You can see if you qualify from the comfort of your own home. That means no scheduling a doctor's appointment, no commute to the doctor's office, and no waiting rooms. Go to roe.co slash search engine. Memberships start at just $99 for your first month. Medication costs are separate.

That's ro.co slash search engine. Go to ro.co slash safety for black box warning and full safety information. Compounded medication is not required to and does not receive FDA review or approval. Prescription only. First of all, can you say your name and how old you are?

I'm four and my name is Adam. And did you just turn four or have you been four for a while? I turned four like a few days ago. You turned four in May, right? Okay. Okay. It's good to have a fact checker.

Otto had arrived with his mother to Surgeon's recording studio because he had a question. Our interview had begun as all my interviews do. I'd offered the guests some candy from our office candy jar. Otto had chosen a lollipop, which he was now crunching on with some gusto. Meanwhile, I was just trying to begin our conversation with some softballs. Um, I asked you your favorite color, but I'm going to ask you again for the record. What's your favorite color? Red. What's your favorite season?

Winter. Winter? Because I like to build snowmans. Oh, that's pretty good. You're here with your mom, is that true? Yes. And what's your mom's name? Hannah. And do you know what your mom's job is? She works at restaurants.

Okay, so just another quick fact check here. Hannah Goldfield, Otto's mom, does not work at restaurants. She writes about them. She's a food critic for The New Yorker. And part of her ethos, and this will become important later, is that she considers it part of her job to, quote, eat anything. You asked your mom a question recently. Do you remember what the question was? Why don't you eat human heads? Why were you wondering about that?

Because I would ask my dad what else I could eat for dinner. And did you suggest a human head or did he suggest a human head? I did. And why do you think you were hungry for a human head? Because I know you eat cow. Yeah? Because that's like beef. I mean, so the full context was that I actually wasn't in the room at the moment that the question was first asked.

And my husband was asking Otto what else he wanted for dinner other than what we were having that night. And I actually can't remember what it was. And Otto said sausage, chicken skin, and the meat of a human head. Okay. Okay. And...

Josh, my husband, was obviously surprised and he laughed. And then he texted me. I was upstairs doing something. He was like, you've got to come down and hear what Otto just said. So we repeated this whole exchange. And I said, Otto, do you know what would have to happen for us to eat the meat of a human head?

And he said, yeah. And I said, you know, the person would have to be dead. And he said, yeah, well, they would already be dead, like an old person, and their body was just there, and we could just eat the meat of their head. And I explained to him that humans don't eat other humans, but the more I tried to explain why...

less of a good answer I had. Did it seem like Otto still wanted to know or was it kind of like the question had more sticking power for you than it did for him? I think it had more sticking power for me. I think that he kind of quickly realized that

It was taboo. And he backed off of it. And that's something I've been thinking a lot about. I actually, I was talking about this to a friend and I described it as taboo. And he thought that that word was like not nearly a strong enough word. He felt like taboo was like, you know, it's taboo not to give up your seat for a pregnant woman on the subway. But, you know, but I think it's one of the ultimate taboos, taboos.

I have a friend who says that the truest taboos are the ones whose existence we don't even acknowledge. It's an idea that we've decided culturally or instinctively is so rotten that it becomes hard to even explain why we don't do it because we don't even talk about why we don't do it. We just don't do it. Yes, exactly. So Hannah found herself stuck thinking about her son's brush with the cannibalism taboo even after Otto had moved on. And she soon found herself poking around on the Internet.

I just like looked up cannibalism on Wikipedia and there's like a famous

Cannibal. Which is such a funny word also. Like when I hear that word, immediately I have this like cartoon image maybe from like Mad Magazine or something of like a quote unquote savage wearing like bones. It's a bone necklace. Yeah, bone necklace, loincloth. The like Western explorers in like an iron pot and like the soups being like gradually heated. Exactly. That's the cannibal in your brain. Right. You start to realize that...

There isn't that much logic to it. And if like tomorrow you got a PR blast email that said like, the people who made the Impossible Burger have figured out how to like make a synthetic human steak, like a lab grown human steak. So you can satisfy your curiosity about human meat without causing human suffering. Would you go?

So the idea would be you can taste what human meat would taste like without... Killing someone. Killing someone. Yeah. I think so, yeah. I think I would. I don't think, if it was totally lab-grown, I think I would. Otto, would you eat human meat if you were allowed to eat human meat? And if nobody had to get hurt for human meat to be eaten? Yeah. And is it because you think it would be tastier or because you're curious? Because I'm curious. Yes.

Will you eat things that are like, that most people would be scared to eat? Like, are you a picky eater? What's the rule in our house about food? Please try something before you say you don't like it. Which would suggest that you guys are slightly breaking your own rules here. If there's just a blanket prohibition on human, human stale meat. I mean, this strikes me as like, it's so absurd and hilarious, but then I'm like, but why? You know? Right, right. Like, it feels so...

Taboo. It just, I feel like a slight sense of nausea, a little bit of shame. Yeah. And yet the most logical part of my brain is like, sure, why not? It's weird. You know it's a taboo because there's the rule, but then there's something more powerful behind the rule that's like bigger than the rule. You know what I mean? It's like, that's how you know you're in the presence of a real taboo. Yeah, exactly. Where you're like, I'm worried to even get near this thing, even though I think I understand why the rule exists. Yeah.

even if there was a carve-out, I'm kind of afraid of being caught near the carve-out. Yes, yes. Have you, like, in the course of your life as a person who eats a lot of things, have you eaten things that felt to you instinctively like...

as like you had a similar reaction as if you'd eaten human meat where you just felt like i shouldn't be eating this or or like i my mind is telling my body not to do this yeah nothing as extreme as the taboo of eating human meat but uh the first thing that comes to mind is balut which is it's a filipino dish and they may eat it another another parts of the world um

It's a fertilized duck egg. I think it can also be other poultry eggs, meaning like unlike an unfertilized egg that you eat with bacon for breakfast, it's been fertilized. So it's like the fetus of a duck. That sound you're hearing in the background is of a precocious and slightly bored four-year-old figuring out that if you make funny sounds with your mouth, the microphone will pick them up. Anyway, Balut. So when you bite into it, is there like...

You like pull out what looks like an embryonic bird. Wow. I had it only once many years ago at a Filipino restaurant, but it's very, very popular there. Like so popular that kids eat it as like an afterschool snack. And I try to remember that it's like everything is so based on what you grew up eating, what was considered normal. So it's like for me, yes, I can't quite get over how weird that feels, but I totally can understand how

Someone could grow up eating that and think it was the most normal thing in the world. But when you were eating it, the FM radio station in your brain was just broadcasting like, no, no, stop now. Yes, for sure. It just felt off to me. Not even like, no, no, no, but like, I'm doing this so I can say that I've tried it, but it's not something I...

will, you know, jump at the chance to eat again. Although I would like, if you offered me some right now, I would try. I just like, I have an insatiable curiosity about food. It's also just funny because it's like, if you were like, do you want to eat an egg? I'd be like, sure. If you were like, do you want to eat a duck? I'd be like, absolutely. If you were like, do you want to eat a baby duck? I'd be like, I don't really have a strong opinion about that. What are the like reproductive...

politics of like, duck fetuses, that is really weird. Like there's just a, there's a complicated amount of culture in that response that I don't know how to explain. Exactly. In America, there's a newer taboo, which says that people shouldn't be disgusted when they encounter foods from other cultures, which is absolutely polite, but also does not take into account that pretty much every culture has ideas about what's gross. And for some of those cultures, what's gross is actually what we eat.

In India, where my editor Shruti grew up, a lot of people are born and raised vegetarian. They've never eaten a bite of meat. Can you imagine how gross meat would be if you'd never eaten it? Or what inhospitable ideas you might harbor about the ropey, wet texture of animal muscles towards the people who compliment crispy skin?

Shruti told me in the school lunchrooms there, she'd often see a kid react to their neighbor eating chicken the way a kid here might react to their neighbor eating balut. Disgust, the real disgust you feel in your stomach, doesn't feel like it comes from culture. Our disgust feels hardwired. But that's just not true. If it were, Otto would have just been born knowing he can't eat people. Instead, it's a rule he's being taught. ♪

And a rule he'll soon understand is so important, he'll forget that he ever had to learn it at all. Okay. Otto, thank you for coming in to ask your question. You're welcome. Hannah, thank you for coming in and bringing Otto. Thanks for having us. Otto, you're free. There's something about eating a person, even if they're already dead, that we've all agreed is something to avoid. And we are not contesting that rule.

But we are interrogating it. We're just asking questions about it. After the break, three stories about cannibalism, at least one of which I think will complicate your certainty about the anti-cannibalism feelings that you think you were born with. We'll see. That's after some ads. Search Engine is brought to you by Greenlight. A new school year is starting soon. My partner has two young kids, both of whom use Greenlight. And honestly, it's been kind of great.

Greenlight is a debit card and money app for families where kids learn how to save, invest, and spend wisely, and parents can keep an eye on kids' new money habits. There's also Greenlight's Infinity Plan, which includes the same access to financial literacy education that makes Greenlight a valuable resource for millions of parents and kids, plus built-in safety to give you peace of mind. There's even a feature that detects car crashes and will connect your young drivers to 911 dispatch and alert emergency contacts if needed.

No matter which features make the most sense for your household, Greenlight is the easy, convenient way for parents to raise financially smart kids and for families to navigate life together. Sign up for Greenlight today and get your first month free when you go to greenlight.com slash search. That's greenlight.com slash search to try Greenlight for free. greenlight.com slash search.

Search Engine is brought to you by Discover Doublenomics. We discuss all things finance and economics here, but have you heard about Doublenomics? It's okay if you haven't, because we like to keep you in the know, and it's extremely niche. Here's an example of Doublenomics. Discover automatically doubles the cashback earned on your credit card at the end of your first year with Cashback Match. That means with Discover, you could turn $150 cashback to $300.

Welcome back to the show. Normally, you know how podcasts work. This is not your first one. We did the intro part, then we do the part where I talk to an expert on cannibalism. Somebody who wrote a book, they'll say a bunch of smart stuff, I'll ask them follow-up questions about it. This week, we're going to do something a little different. So I read a bunch of books on cannibalism, some science, some cultural history. I watched a TED Talk, there is a cannibalism TED Talk, and then I called a friend.

I mentioned in the first half when I was talking to Hannah that I had a friend who I text with about taboos. You're probably picturing a pretty tawdry relationship right now, but it's just my friend, Calva. Calvasane. You may have heard him in another episode of Search Engine where we asked him, how am I supposed to find new music now that I'm old and irrelevant?

Kalva, welcome back. PJ, I'm here. I've been here. I know. Ever since the last time you interviewed me for your podcast, I've been sitting here at this table, in this chair, watching you, listening, waiting patiently for you to turn my microphone back on. I'm sorry I made you wait so long. Finally. So the reason that I wanted you talking here today, we talked about

We text a lot. You're, I would say, chronically open-minded to the point where presented with most rules, particularly most social rules, you're the person I know who's liable to ask, why? How come? Are we sure? Does it seem like a fair characterization? I think that's a fair characterization. So then, before we even begin, I just want to make sure that I know what page we're starting on. Like, what is your feeling about people eating people? My feeling about people eating people? I mean...

Look, this is a taboo that everyone recognizes is a taboo. But when you tell me about people eating people, I immediately want to break it apart into different pieces, right? There's people eating people on top of a mountain after a plane crash. And some people have died and the other people need the sustenance, right? That's one kind. Yes. There's a kind of ritualized people eating people where that's part of the culture and you do it on special occasions or for a special reason or whatever.

There's lots of different kinds of people eating people, but in general, yes, I certainly share the idea that it's something that we generally don't do, and I can't claim I've ever had an overriding desire to do it. Okay, so caliphate being caliphate is already a step ahead of me, defining some of our categories here. But I do have a plan for how this is going to go. Well, not a plan, a menu. Today, I'm going to serve you three stories of cannibalism.

The Amuse-Bouche is a historical story, possibly the origin story of our modern fear of cannibals. For the main course, I have a contemporary story of a person eating a person. And for dessert, a mystery set in remote Papua New Guinea. Okay, so the first story I told to Kelatha, The Conquest.

Okay, so Kay, this story happens alongside the Western entry into the Americas. And I think it is where we got the modern meme of cannibalism, like the ubiquitous cartoon image that Hannah and I talked about, this guy with a bone in his nose cooking an explorer in a steaming cauldron.

That image, like the origin story of that image, I think I have a story of that for you. The origin of cannibalism as taboo. Now we know how the taboo starts and we can work on ending it. Yes. Okay. 1493, Christopher Columbus lands in Guadalupe, which at the time he would call Santa Maria de Guadalupe. He's on his second voyage to the New World. According to this one book I read called Cannibalism, A Perfectly Natural History by Bill Shutt,

Columbus' prime directive, like his mission from Spain, was to find gold in the islands. I don't know why this belief was propagated, but the Europeans believed that silver was found in cold places and gold was found in hot places. So according to their logic, it stood to reason this expedition was going to yield lots and lots of gold.

So he arrives with an army of 17 ships, lots of well-armed men, and he reports back to his sponsors in Spain that there's this one group of native people called the Arawaks. And according to Columbus, these Arawaks, they are great. He writes that the Arawaks, quote, are fitted to be ruled and to be set to work, to cultivate the land and do all else that may be necessary. Hmm.

But, according to Columbus, the Arawaks warn that there's this other group on certain southern islands, and this group is not as nice. They're called the Caribs. The Caribs do not want to be ruled. They're ready to fight. And Columbus says that the Arawaks warn him, if the Caribs beat you in battle, they might eat you. Columbus writes, quote,

—

So this is a familiar story. He's going to some faraway place, meeting a bunch of people, and basically trying to categorize them. Yes, exactly. And like some of them, he seems like they're going to be helpful. Some of them are not. So these locals are called Caribs. Carib somehow gets mistranslated to cannib. And cannibal becomes like what the cannibs do. So this is really like...

While there was an idea that it was bad to eat people before this, we had a different name for them. Like, cannibal goes to this moment. But this whole story is just rife with, like, mistranslation, misunderstanding. And so we don't know what really happened. Like, did Columbus make all this up? Were the Caribs actually ritually eating their captured enemies? Were the Arawaks making this up to get Columbus to go after their enemies? Like, there's just a lot of debate here even today about

But what's important is Columbus told people that on these islands, some of the locals were dangerous and that they would eat his men. Why did the eating thing loom so large in his mind? I feel like if I was meeting some people, possibly hostile, whether or not they would kill me would loom a lot larger in my mind than whether or not they would eat me. I think it was just sort of like...

a particularly bad way to die in their minds? Because I agree. Like, for me, I'm like, I'd prefer not to be killed. After being killed, being eaten would be like a tertiary concern, probably. But maybe it's a way of measuring distance. Maybe it's a way of thinking, well, me and people like us, we don't eat people. And so if I encounter someone and I hear that they do eat people, then those people are somehow maximally different from me and my people. Right.

I think there's a lot of evidence that that is what is going on here. Because what ends up happening is Queen Isabella, who has sent Thomas on this journey, when she gets the reports back that some of these people eat people, she says that he's allowed to treat the cannibals differently from the other locals. Ooh, I see. So the incentive structure gets all messed up. Exactly. So she writes, this is the letter she sends.

If such cannibals continue to resist and do not wish to admit and receive to their lands the captains and men who may be on such voyages by my orders, nor to hear them in order to be taught our sacred Catholic faith and to be in my service and obedience, they may be captured and are taken to these my kingdoms and domains and to other parts and places and to be sold.

So basically, just the queen appears to be giving Columbus and his fellow colonizers special permission to subjugate and enslave cannibals in a way that he wouldn't be able to with other people. Because cannibal is sort of linked with a kind of a maximum cruelty or a definition of quote unquote savagery. Yes. And so what ends up happening, he shows up trying to find gold because, again, he thinks you find gold in hot places. Yeah.

There's not as much gold as he was anticipating. And so since they're not finding gold, the Spaniards just start looking for people to enslave. And that will be the resource that they go after. So now, even when they're in Arawak country, they'll just label people there cannibals. Anytime someone resists them, anytime it's convenient, it's like this magic word, cannibal. You call somebody a cannibal, you can take their rights away. But there's an irony here, right? Which is that...

For those people in Spain at that time, cannibalism represented human beings at their worst, right? And for us, many of us now, enslavement represents human beings at their worst. Yes. And so the idea was if we suspect the way from what you're telling me, the idea is they were like, if we suspect that human beings are being at their worst, we're going to do the thing that future generations will think of as human beings at their worst. Exactly. Exactly.

There's actually another complicating story here. The whole time the Europeans are obsessed with cannibalism, they're practicing cannibalism, just like in a slightly different form. Oh.

So the thing they were accusing the cannibals of doing was ritual cannibalism. It's like, I eat you because I won in combat, because it symbolizes something, because I think that I get strength from doing it. What the Europeans had been doing was medical cannibalism, which is when you eat people or body parts because you think there's a medical benefit to it. So there had been a trend from the 11th century through the 17th century in Europe of eating something called

Mummia, which was a material made from ground-up powdered mummies, which was supposed to be good for you. They had gotten it. Obvious question about the sourcing. Yes. Are these ethically sourced mummies? These were not ethically sourced mummies. These were deeply unethically sourced mummies. They were robbing mummies from Egyptian graves. This suggests...

that this would be a very valuable product because there's a finite supply of mummies? So it is a valuable product, and it quickly becomes a problem, which is that they exhaust the finite supply. Did they call it peak mummy? No, they just pretended like they had more mummies and started finding other recently dead people.

That sounds, I don't want to go on a limb, that sounds bad. It was bad. So they had recipes to speed up the mummification process of corpses. There's a, I don't know how to pronounce this, there's a 17th century book called London Pharmacopoeiae, which includes a recipe describing how to do this. I've read about it in Shutt's book, but the recipe recommends that, quote, a mummy be made of the cadaver of a redheaded man, age 24, who'd been hanged,

The corpse is to lie in cold water in the air for 24 hours, after which the flesh was cut in pieces and sprinkled with a powder of myrrh and aloes. This was soaked in the spirit of wine and turpentine for 24 hours, hung up for 12 hours, and again smoked in the spirit mixture for 24 hours, and finally hung up to dry.

Was there a sense about why these people were being hanged? Or was the idea that we're hanging so many people, we can just grab some of the ones that happen to have red hair? My guess is the latter, although I'm also not sure how you get from...

there's something special about an Egyptian mummy to whatever is special about an Egyptian mummy is also special about a red-haired person, except for, like, maybe red-haired people were rare. But, you know, in a non-taboo sense, that's the big... That seems like a big distinction, right? What do you mean? Are we killing people so we can eat them, or are we doing weird things to corpses? Yeah, and I have to say, in my whatever, like, internal kind of taboo radar I have inside of me...

Killing people so you can eat them feels like way worse than doing weird things to corpses. Like if they were hanging...

It doesn't seem like that big a deal. It seems completely fine. Yeah, so I don't know. Completely fine. You're on the record, PJ. It seems mostly completely fine. They're going to have to bury you in an unmarked location. They can just throw me in the ocean.

Okay, so remembering Otto's question, why can't we eat people? I think what's nice about the carob story is it's kind of like the fact that we have this taboo against cannibalism. We would have the taboo anyway. I feel very confident about that. But the language we have for it, like the fact that we call cannibals cannibals, and the mental image that's in Hannah's mind and in my mind of the explorer in the Stephen Cauldron with the islanders going around him, that comes from this historical moment.

Like, there was a reason to have political propaganda in 1493, well after Columbus sort of completed his mission of taking over this land and wiping out lots of people. We're left with this little artifact. And I just find that interesting. Mm-hmm.

Anyway, that is our first story. Before we go to the next story, I just want to say that one aspect of cannibalism I'm not going to spend very much time on this week is survival cannibalism. That's when people eat people because they're forced to by extreme circumstance.

In America, we have the Donner Party, who in the 1800s took what they were told was a shortcut on the Oregon Trail, then were stuck camping through a very harsh winter. They ate some of their dead. In Uruguay in the 1970s, there was very famously that rugby team whose plane crashed in the mountains. Those survivors ate some of their dead as well. Obviously, those are vivid examples of cannibalism.

For me, what I find most interesting is that in cases like the rugby team, we'll say that they get a pass, but then we will also mark them for what they were forced to do. Like, it's almost like we've decided that they are in a different category now. The only reason I'm not spending much time on survival cannibalism is I think it's sort of the exception to Otto's question. Like, as far as I can tell, the rule goes, if you're starving and people are dead, you can eat people. It's just that that fact will now dominate your Wikipedia page for the rest of time.

So cannibalism might be acceptable under certain circumstances, but it's still going to be infamous. Yes, exactly. And like, it's sort of weird because those people have survived terrible things. And it's like, I mean, I understand why they are infamous for the way they survived. But like, yeah, it's just a mark that I don't think they ever get to get around. And we'll use cannibalism to judge the terribleness of the thing they survived.

Right. How bad was it up there? It was so bad they had to eat people. Yeah. And you almost like it was funny. I was reading. I was trying to decide whether to include the Donner Party story in this. And I read a lot about the Donner Party story. And it's like there's a lot of story there besides that fact.

But I also understand my brain does it too. My brain is just like daughter party eating people. That's it. Yeah, and maybe it's that little kid part of your brain, right? That's like fascinated by this thing that we don't do. So of course, anytime there's a story about someone doing the thing, that's much more interesting than just like someone went into the snow and died. Yeah, it's also interesting in the story because like there's even this much time later, when you read an account of it,

The writing will be one way where it's like, you know, they'd read this book and the book suggested a shortcut and the shortcut sent to the wrong place. And it's sort of one level of detail. And then once it gets into the cannibalism sections, it gets so much more detailed and so much more like at the time, this person claims that they didn't do it. But later we found out they did do it. But it almost takes on the feeling of gossip where how the information got out becomes very important. And you just realize like,

"Oh, we are fascinated by this." But PJ, in the interest of listener service, you explained in some detail how to make mumia. Yes. Do you have a Donner Party recipe too? Oh my God. It doesn't seem like... Honestly, here's what I will say about the Donner Party. The most fascinating thing about the Donner Party story is not about the preparation of humans. It's that, and I didn't know this, the reason they got lost is that there's all these people who are going out west.

And there was like a cottage industry of people who were selling them guidebooks. And there was this guy who was essentially a huckster who wrote a guidebook that's like, so you're going out west? Here's how to do it. And what the other guys won't tell you is I found a secret shortcut. Oh, it's like maps to the stars' houses. Yes, except for this map to the stars' house was a bad map that he had not actually tried himself. After publicizing the book, he tried it once just like on a horse by himself.

And so no one in a wagon had tried to do what he said was easy to do. And the whole time they're proceeding on this shortcut that they've read about in his book, and they're realizing how bad it is, he had gone out ahead as like promotion and he

like nailed to the trees, notes encouraging people to keep following his path. And so things are getting worse and worse and they're beginning to understand the size of their predicament. And then they're finding these like cheerful notes being like, keep on going. That's the best part of the daughter party story. It's just the grimness of, you know,

having received bad advice from someone promoting their book, which feels like a very modern problem. The survivors immediately went on goodreads.com. One star. Do not recommend. I mean, I like the idea that Hannah's kid asks, why can't we eat people? And that your answer would include at least one recipe. Yes, at least one recipe. There will actually be another recipe before the end of this. Spoiler. Okay, so...

I'm not talking about survival cannibalism, except for that. The other sort of cannibalism, the thing that I noticed reading more about cannibalism and reading these books by experts about cannibalism is that I have noticed a trend among the academics, which is that they don't like talking about murderous cannibalism, like Jeffrey Dahmer style cannibalism.

In the Bill Shutt book I read, he goes out of his way to say he is not going to talk about, like, your Ed Geins, like, your serial killers who ate people. He has a passing reference to the one German guy who consensually ate a person. The famous German guy. Who I have questions for you about. But he's like, he almost, like, doesn't want to count them in his cannibalism ethnography. Why? Because they're outliers? They're too unusual? Well, here's what's interesting. He says it would be disrespectful to the victims, but to me, I'm like...

But that's the taboo, isn't it? Like, that's where you're like, even in walking up to the electric fence, I'm going to step away from the electric fence. Like, I don't want to think about the part of this that is sort of at the core of it. Right. Okay, so I want to talk about the German cannibal. That's actually the second story I want to tell you, which I'm going to call The Trial. I feel like I should say, if, like, kids are listening to this episode, this would be a good part to skip. Like, this is not stuff I would have wanted in my 13-year-old brain.

But to me, kind of the most interesting murderous cannibal story when it comes to just thinking about the cannibalism rule and why we have it is the story of the German cannibal, Armin Maives. He was a German computer repair technician. He went on a cannibalism message board called the Cannibal Cafe and said he was looking for a man who wanted to be killed and consumed. ♪

♪♪

According to reports at the time, Germans were shocked by the sentence. They thought it was way too light. It also probably didn't help that Maivez was saying that he still had fantasies of reoffending once he got out of jail. And so the prosecutors call for a retrial. And they get the court to, like, really pay attention to the tape.

And interestingly, in Germany, the way German law defines murder, one of the things that can make a killing a murder is that the killer was looking for sexual gratification. And so they pushed that idea here. They're like, if you look at the video, clearly this is about sexual gratification. The video had been included in the first trial. But this time, the court looks at it and they say, yes, this is Germany's version of murder. He's getting a life sentence.

But I think you could look at this and you could say what you're actually seeing is a country trying to decide, like, what are the limits of things we'll allow consenting adults to do to each other? And realize, like, oh.

We definitely still have a cannibalism taboo. Although there's a way of thinking about that case in a consent-based framework, right? You can think about that and say, like, well, this other person, it wasn't truly informed consent. That's not something one can consent to if one is in one's right mind. Therefore, that consent is not valid. Therefore, we're going to prosecute it as murder. That's separate from the question of, did he do something extra wrong?

Do you think it would have been the same? Yeah. To me, that's the crime, right, is the actual killing. Right. And what happens later, you know...

We have laws about desecrating a corpse or something, and there are those other laws. But, you know, mainly to the extent which it's outrageous, the murder is the outrage, even though the other part, the cannibal part, is what makes us all think about it and the reason we know about it. Right. Yeah. But it's not obvious to me that that revulsion that most of us have at the idea of cannibalism exists.

It's not obvious to me that that's wrong, right? Like, that might be a moral intuition we should learn from and respect. And one way to respect a moral intuition is to have laws against it. So, okay. So, on the one hand, it's like you're saying once you're dead, if some future society eats your corpse, it's, like, not the biggest deal in the world. But you're also saying that, like, if we have a feeling that...

like a moral intuition that cannibalism is wrong, we should probably follow that feeling and create laws around it. Like where...

You're both sides in cannibalism. I am a little bit because I'm having a double reaction to the existence of a taboo, right? And so my first reaction is to be like, oh, there's a taboo here where we're being guided by something besides our rational sense of consent and not harming people, right? Part of this reaction is like a little bit superstitious, right? So my first reaction is to kind of like try to identify the superstition. But my second reaction is to be like, well...

there is something to be said for superstition in that sense. There is something to be said for taboo. And when I think about it, just because I acknowledge that it is a taboo doesn't mean I want to get rid of that taboo or get rid of all taboos. And I think the reason I like thinking about cannibalism as a taboo, even though maybe it's silly, is because it's the one where I'm actually most convinced that it might be natural. I think Columbus informed...

the language we use for cannibalism and like the cartoon images in our head we use for cannibalism. But like, I think it's a rule that as many different human societies as could flourish and as many ways they could construct themselves, like most of them when they, if they wrote down their taboos, which they wouldn't, but if they did, cannibalism was one of them. So I think I just like thinking about it because it almost feels hardwired, but then you can also see where it's

Yeah, and this is a heuristic that can lead you astray, right? Like, you can say, like, I've grown up in a world where...

you know, slavery is considered okay, and I'm looking at other societies, and it seems like there's slavery all over the world, and there's a long history of slavery, so this must be a natural feeling, right? Like, that's a way of thinking that can lead you astray. But obviously, the point is, there's no way to be sure, right? This is what philosophers talk about. This is, right, the idea of, like, which of these things that seem really obvious to me are actually kind of wrong. And there's no way to be sure that the things that feel obvious to you

are not, in fact, wrong. I feel pretty sure about camels. A lot of people have felt pretty sure about a lot of things over the years. After the break, a mystery in Papua New Guinea that might make us question some of the things we're pretty sure we're pretty sure about. The story of the foray. Search Engine is brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs.

When you're hiring for your small business, you want to find quality professionals that are right for the role. That's why you have to check out LinkedIn Jobs. LinkedIn Jobs has the tools to help find the right professionals for your team faster and for free. At Search Engine, we have a super small team where hiring is very important. So we understand how important it is to find quality candidates for jobs.

LinkedIn isn't just a job board. LinkedIn helps you hire professionals you can't find anywhere else, even those who aren't actively searching for a new job but might be open to the perfect role. In a given month, over 70% of LinkedIn users don't visit other leading job sites. So if you're not looking on LinkedIn, you're looking in the wrong place. On LinkedIn, 86% of small businesses get a qualified candidate within 24 hours. Hire professionals like a professional on LinkedIn.

LinkedIn knows that small businesses are wearing so many hats and might not have the time or resources to hire. And LinkedIn is constantly finding ways to make the process easier. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash pjsearch. That's linkedin.com slash pjsearch to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply. Search Engine is brought to you by Spotpet.

Searching listeners know that I love my dog more than anything else in this world. I want to be buried in a pyramid with him when he dies or when I die. Whoever goes first, we're going together. I want to share a message from our trusted companion in helping you be ready for any unexpected vet visits. Spot Pet Insurance.

Spot Pet Insurance is your virtual ally against the unexpected. With spot plans, you can receive up to 90% cash back on eligible vet bills, helping to transform unforeseen expenses into manageable moments of care for your cherished pets.

Spot Pet insurance plans go beyond just offering coverage for accidents and illnesses. Access to a 24-7 vet telehealth hotline is included with every policy, so you can ask an expert all your questions. You can also enhance your plan with their preventative care benefit, helping ensure routine wellness, vaccines, and more can be covered too. Head over to spotpet.com for an instant quote today.

I think I'm supposed to read this part super fast, so I'm going to read this part super fast. Ready? Disclaimer. Pay to add from Spot Pet Insurance. Waiting periods, annual deductibles, co-insurance, benefit limits, and exclusions may apply. For all terms, visit spotpetins.com slash sample policy. Insurance plans are underwritten by either Independent American Insurance Company or United States Fire Insurance Company and produced by Spot Pet Insurance Services LLC. Welcome back to the show. We've reached our third and final story here, the funeral. Okay.

Kalva, I'm just going to read you my not-short introduction to this one. I'm ready to hear it. Okay. On the island of Papua New Guinea, there's this small group of people called the Foray. The Foray are a group in the tens of thousands who for years had been almost entirely uncontacted by outsiders. They live in the remote eastern highlands. Picture a dense landscape of green hills.

The Foray have few encounters with the Western world. There's a run-in with an Australian gold prospector in the 1930s. In the 40s, apparently one World War II fighter plane crashes near them, which must have been an insane experience. But they're mainly left alone until the 1950s, when anthropologists start to really get curious about how the Foray live. And as the anthropologists arrive with their questions, they learn the Foray have one of their own.

The Foray tell the anthropologists that their people are dying in large numbers and in this very scary way. There's a mysterious phenomenon called Kuru. The Foray think it's a curse. The anthropologists think it's a disease. The Western media outlets hear about it, and they start calling it laughing sickness. Kuru mostly affects children and women. Something like only 2% of cases were found in adult males. When you get Kuru, the first stage is that you begin to walk in a wobbly way.

You struggle to pronounce some familiar words. It sounds to me a little bit like being too drunk at a wedding. The next phase is where it begins to get scary. You shake, you shiver, you have goosebumps, and you start to laugh. Not because anything's funny. These are spasms. Huge, uncontrollable bouts of laughter that come out of nowhere and which you cannot stop. At this point, you know you have Kuru, and you know that that means you're going to die.

How much time you have left ranges. Some people live with the disease for two months, some people as long as three years. But no one recovers. Everyone arrives at the final stage. In the final stage, you struggle even to sit up. You may not be able to talk. You're conscious, but you don't seem to be present. One of the last things you lose is your ability to swallow. Food, water. This is the point where if you're 4A, the people who love you will smother you to death out of mercy so that you don't starve.

But if Kuru was a disease, it didn't function like any disease anyone had ever seen. It didn't seem to be contagious. You could sit with a person dying of Kuru and not catch it yourself. But when the Foray moved in with other groups living near them, sometimes Kuru came with them. In the 50s, Westerners were guessing that Kuru might be genetic. If so, it was a recent mutation, because the Foray told them this phenomenon was relatively new. It may have only been happening since the 1910s. There'd been one explanation that had been sort of a rumor that no one seemed to want to commit to writing.

In the late 60s, two papers are published hypothesizing that the 4A may be contracting Kuru through cannibalism. The 4A ate their dead. Not always, not all the time, but in the same way that you tell your partner whether you want to be buried or cremated, in 4A society, you would tell your partner if you wanted to be buried, left out in the forest, or consumed by your family. This is from a paper by an anthropologist named Jerome T. Whitfield about what happened to a 4A person who chose to be consumed.

Quote, the head of the deceased was placed over a fire to burn off the hair, and then it was defleshed with a bamboo knife. A hole was made in the top of the skull using a stone, and the brain was gradually removed by one of the older women, whose hand would be wrapped in ferns. The tissue was then mixed with ferns and placed in bamboo tubes, normally two or three, and cooked. End quote. For the foray who were eaten, the head and the brains were typically reserved for women, but women would sometimes bring their children to the funerary rite and share food with them.

There's something beautiful about that. That's what surprises me. It's really, you know, you compare it to other rites. On the one hand, to eating the placenta, right? Which is a tradition that some people are reviving. Or even to something like a wake, where if you've never been to an open casket wake...

it's a little bit strange. But yes, this seems like an incredibly respectful way of honoring a body, right? It's not treating a body as meat. No, and it's funny, my assumption is that any society that's practicing cannibalism, it's because of a lack of respect for the body. But this seems like it comes from a place of utmost respect for a body. And from the foray's perspective, if you love someone...

First of all, it would be better to be consumed by the people who love you than by worms and maggots, which is like what's going to happen if you're in the ground or left out. But also they felt that by consuming the person, they might be consuming like not parts like body parts, but like aspects of the person's personality might transfer them or their soul might be protected in some way. Like it feels like.

They have a sense of protecting life, and it's causing them to do this thing that in our culture is associated with, you know, a deep disrespect for life. Yeah, I mean, you know, at the base of the cannibalism taboo is this idea that as human beings, we don't look at each other as food.

And this, in a way, honors that, right? This isn't like, oh, this person died, they're going to be delicious, right? This is like, yeah, we don't look at each other as food, and we're going to do this ritualistic thing to honor the life, maybe. Yeah. So what's interesting about where this foray story ends is these anthropologists generally knew there was some debate, but the sort of weight of evidence was on the side of the idea that the foray were eating their dead, right?

Because they knew that, what they were able to figure out is that when they ate their dead, sometimes what was happening is they were spreading Kuru. It's a prion disease, which was a relatively not understood kind of disease, but it's like an infection of brain protein. Mm-hmm.

And so when they ate brain tissue from a dead foray, they were getting this disease. The strange thing about Kuru is it doesn't show up right away. You can carry it for something like as long as 40 years before the time bomb explodes. And so it wasn't person dies, we hold a funeral for them. The next week, everyone's ill. It was like person dies, we hold a funeral for them. Maybe many years later, someone's ill.

But the actual ending of the story was the foray decided to change the rules around cannibalism. But it wasn't because cannibalism was wrong or gross. It was just like...

We're dying from it. You know, there is this idea that a lot of food taboos traditionally, you think of kosher and halal systems, had to do partly with health and had to do partly with safety and ways of consuming meat that wouldn't put you at risk. And so it's not surprising to learn that there might be some element of that in the taboo against human cannibalism.

This would be interesting if the cannibalism taboo, which we assume is about protecting others, might turn out to be also about protecting ourselves. But hypothetically, what if there was a safe way for us to consume people? This is something that had come up in conversation with Hannah, too. Synthetically created human meat. Would you eat lab-grown human meat?

I can tell you what I want to say I would do, and I can tell you what I know is real. Like, I want to say, like, of course I would try it. I'm a curious person. I wanted to have every single experience. I'm afraid of nothing, blah, blah, blah. Somebody took me on a date once to this restaurant in Toronto.

Where you could eat just like the brains of animals. And I threw up right away. And there was nothing about the food that was bad. It's just like the idea that I was eating a brain and people have brains and you're not supposed to eat brains because people have brains like caused me to have a physical reaction where I vomited. So I don't think I would eat. Would you eat human grown lab meat?

Lab-grown human meat. Human-grown lab meat would be a scientist who was murdered in his lab while working late one night. I think I would eat lab-grown human meat. I mean, it doesn't seem like we're necessarily too far away from a time when you can grow all different kinds of flesh in a lab. Yeah. And so in that sense, what it would mean for it to be quote-unquote human is

I guess, would have something to do with the DNA and I don't know, but it gets a little abstract. But what about the argument that you've made, which is that if you create that world in which we can eat synthetic human meat and have like

PJ sandwiches or whatever, you are reducing, you're lowering the strength of this natural taboo against the sacredness of our bodies and then like perhaps creating a society that you don't want to live in. Yeah. And I mean, you know, that's part of what modernization is, right? It's like various taboos get considered superstitious and they kind of fall away. And then the question is, can we hold the line against other kinds of behavior we think is bad, even as these taboos get weakened?

Sometimes we need to develop new taboos or new rules, right? You're living in a world where, like, sex leads to pregnancy, and then all these birth control technologies come in, and then you've got to re-figure out your rules and your taboos around sex, which were, you know...

still in the process of doing. Yeah. In this case, would it be possible to still respect people's bodies and not eat people's bodies even if we're eating lab-grown meat that sort of tastes the way someone's body would taste? I suspect, maybe this is a cop-out. Can I give you a cop-out answer? Yeah. So one cop-out answer is

Maybe we didn't evolve to find the taste of humans that delicious and so that when we're comparing different kinds of lab meat, we're going to be drawn to things that are a little bit more like the kinds of things that humans have traditionally eaten.

I will tell you, unfortunately, so these people... Is this going to be a version of the New Yorker cartoon where the doctor says to the pig, it's your ribs, I'm afraid they're delicious? Basically, yeah, yeah. The anthropologist who wrote this paper on the foray, the part that I found kind of most like, oh, shit. Can I read you one more quote from the paper? Mm-hmm.

So the way they talk about the type of cannibalism that the four-way practice as endo cannibalism endo cannibalism is you're eating members of your group. Mm-hmm. I so cannibalism is eating members of the out group So so they're explaining like why they did it later works have explained the role of endo cannibalism in the epidemiology of Kuru and emphasized that the body was eaten out of love like grief love as well as

as for gastronomic appreciation, which was not the intended purpose of the practice, but its result. What does that mean, the intended purpose of the practice? It means that while they were eating their dead to communicate all these things about life and love and grief, the side effect was that they were discovering that people are actually really tasty.

Oh, but it's hard to separate tastiness from the stories we tell us, right? Just like the label on a bottle of wine is going to affect the way it tastes to people. Right. Right? If you have all this buildup and all this ritual and all this symbolic meaning, maybe the human body starts to taste delicious the same way a communion wafer might taste delicious to a believer. I also think that, you know, there's reason to imagine that we might have evolved not to find humans tasty. Right.

In general. Right, right, right. I like the idea that you'd respond to this kid with this question the way we often respond to kids, which is by telling them something that's sort of mainly true. True but incomplete. Yes. I think true but incomplete is like the way out of answering this without having to like horrify him with a bunch of stories about like

Yes. That's Califasane, a taboo critic, but sometimes a taboo supporter. He writes about all sorts of things at The New Yorker. This week, as we were wrapping the episode, I briefly spoke with Hannah, Otto's mom.

She said in the couple months since we first spoke, Otto keeps changing the way four-year-olds do. She says these days they play a game where when he goes to bed, he's allowed to ask his parents a certain amount of questions before he falls asleep. This week, she said Otto has not been wondering about cannibalism. His mind had moved on to another question, which, frankly, I don't have the answer to. What are rocks made out of? Maybe that's next week on Search Engine. After the break, the most anxiety-inducing command in the English language.

Save on Cox Internet when you add Cox Mobile and get fiber-powered internet at home and unbeatable 5G reliability on the go. So whether you're playing a game at home or attending one live,

You can do more without spending more. Learn how to save at Cox.com slash internet. Cox internet is connected to the premises via coaxial cable. Cox mobile runs on the network with unbeatable 5G reliability as measured by UCLA LLC in the U.S. to age 2023. Results may vary, not an endorsement. Other restrictions apply. Check, check, check. Oh, there we go. Now we're live. Hot, hot, hot. Hello, hello, hello. Okay.

Welcome back to the show. I'm here in the studio with Search Engine producer, Garrett Graham. It's great to be here. And we're here because it's time for us to do recommendations. I feel like this week we have like... It's a little bit of a show and tell. It's a show and tell. I feel like we're making one of those TV morning shows because on the studio table here, there's two plates with little paper towel napkins and silver on them because we both brought food recommendations for each other.

It's like, what podcast are we making now? We're just keeping with the organization of the episode. We're just throwing a second dessert on. It's like when you're about to leave the restaurant and they're like, the kitchen's friendly with you and they're like, we brought you one more thing. Precisely. Who goes first? Why don't we, let's go pastry first. So I brought some pastries. I do want to set them up briefly though, which is that

A couple of weeks ago, you plugged a sandwich shop. I plugged a local Brooklyn sandwich and pastry shop where I approved both the way they ran their business and the quality of their food. And I was like, is it okay that this is such a New York-specific recommendation? We decided that it was okay. We're doubling down a little bit. But also, we're doubling down specifically because my competitive juices started flowing a little bit. You were really hyping up.

Sea and soil. You were wearing some sea and soil paraphernalia around the office. I had a hat. Yes. I am in love with a pastry shop in my neighborhood. So I brought some pastries for us to sample. Oh, these are gorgeous. Okay, so there are three options you get to pick. I brought a ham and cheese croissant, which they sneak a little stone ground mustard inside of. Wow. A sesame...

I have never been confident saying that word. I'm not going to start now. I'm not confident enough to correct you. And then I brought a sunchoke mushroom cheesy Danish. Oh, wow. Which is a bit of a curveball, I got to be honest. A savory pastry. A savory pastry. So you get to draft first. I'm going to try the savory pastry. Savory pastry. Okay, here we go. So where are these pastries from? So these pastries are from...

a bakery in my neighborhood. It's called Otway. You've been talking about Otway a lot, like a lot. It's O-T-W-A-Y. And also there was a listener who joined in and was like, you have to try Otway, which at that point I was like, okay, clearly something's going on with this pastry place. It's magnificent. I feel like I'm in a weird position now though, where like,

If I don't like this pastry, I'm just... You can't tell me. I will also be just, like, crapping on some pastry shop on an, like, international podcast for no reason. Pressure's kind of on for you and for Atwood. There's this quote. I'm not sure it's true, but somebody told me that philosopher Zizek said the most anxiety-producing command that you can get in the English language is enjoy, which is how I feel holding this pastry. Huh. It's really good. It's, like, flaky. Oh, man. Hold on.

That's amazing. It's almost like eating a croissant pizza. Wow. Okay. I would recommend Otway. I think if you're visiting... Is it in Manhattan? It's in Brooklyn. It's in Brooklyn in the Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy kind of area. Is this eventually just going to be a podcast where we review pastries in Brooklyn? Yes, that's season two. Is there a business model for that? We'll have to hear from our listeners. Also, we should establish that while the podcast industry is doing very poorly...

This is not a paid segment. The way we're funding this podcast is not by shaking down coffee shops. This is a passion project. This is a passion project. Okay, this is my recommendation, which is not local to Brooklyn, which might be a relief for some listeners. So...

My friend Chris Crawford runs this company called Tart Vinegar. It's like she makes her own vinegar in a very, very, very small factory in Brooklyn. What's this vinegar? This one is salad and soup vinegar. And the thing she started doing recently, which is really helpful, is like...

Because, like, I always, basically this holiday season, I just buy everybody Chris's vinegar. But everybody appreciates it, and then sometimes they don't know what to do with it. And with this, now she has recipes on the side. But do you just want to try straight vinegar? Sure. Okay, here's a spoonful of vinegar. Vinegar and pastries, classic Thanksgiving fare. Yes. What do you think?

Oh, it's really nice. If you hadn't told me it was vinegar, I don't think I would have said vinegar. What would you have thought? It just tastes like kind of a tasty drink. Yeah, I actually drink this. I'll like mix this with seltzer and just like drink it at my home. I think there are people who believe there are health benefits. I just like it. I just like their vinegars. Right. Okay, so my recommendation is tart vinegar, which you can get on the internet. Your recommendation is Otway Bakery. No,

Neither of these companies have paid us to endorse their products. I'll pay them to endorse their products. I pay them every morning when I get a coffee or a pastry. You pay for pastries. I pay for vinegar. Search Engine is a presentation of Odyssey and Jigsaw Productions. It was created by PJ Voigt and Shruthi Pinamaneni and is produced by me, Garrett Graham, and Noah John.

Theme, original composition, and mixing by Armin Bizarian. Fact-checking by Sean Merchant. Special thanks this week to David Cho. Our executive producers are Jenna Weiss-Berman and Leah Reese-Dennis. Thanks to the team at Jigsaw, Alex Gibney, Rich Pirello, and John Schmidt. And to the team at Odyssey, J.D. Crowley, Rob Morandi, Craig Cox, Eric Donnelly, Matt Casey, Maura Curran, Josephina Francis, Kurt Courtney, and Hilary Schuff.

Thank you.

Okay, that's it for this week. Thank you for listening. We're off next week, but we will see you back here on December 1st.