Chapters
Shownotes Transcript
There's nothing worse than getting home from your trip only to find out you missed a can't-miss travel experience. That's why you need Viator. Book guided tours, excursions, and more in one place to make your trip truly unregrettable. There are over 300,000 travel experiences to choose from so you can find something for everyone. And Viator offers free cancellation and 24-7 customer service. So you always have support around the clock.
Download the Viator app now to use code VIATOR10 for 10% off your first booking in the app. Regret less. Do more with Viator.
Hey, everyone. Ellie here wishing you a happy Friday. Well, we are rolling towards the end of week two of trial testimony, week three of the trial as a whole, if you count jury selection. And my overall assessment thus far, as I've said on air, is that for the prosecutors so far, so good. We don't have some sort of smoking gun. This is not a smoking gun case.
But they're doing a good job of building the foundation for this case, of explaining to the jury how Catch and Kill works and what the negotiations were between the Inquirer, Michael Cohen, and Trump. The big moment's going to be when Michael Cohen takes a stand, and there will be a very important moment within that testimony, which I'm going to talk about in today's piece. As always, please send me your thoughts, questions, and comments. I really do enjoy hearing what you have to say. Send them in to letters at cafe.com. ♪
During my career as a prosecutor, anytime I worked a case involving a large mafia takedown, defense lawyers would sidle up to me throughout arraignment day and ask me this one key question. So is it a tapes case?
Now, there's no insider lingo involved here. Tapes mean tapes, as in, do you have my guy on tape? When I'd answer, nope, I'd see eyebrows raised in a, hmm, maybe there's hope for my guy yet, manner. But when I answered yes, I'd typically get a quick nod, communicating that the defense lawyer understood it would be all about negotiating a guilty plea from that point on. Indeed, tapes are the prosecutor's best friend. Usually.
Usually. But when Michael Cohen secretly recorded a phone call with his own client, Donald Trump, in September 2016, he created a piece of evidence that could become a key part of Trump's defense in his ongoing criminal trial in Manhattan.
Now, it's not all bad news for prosecutors, of course. The tape confirms an important pillar of the district attorney's case. Trump plainly knew about and approved of hush money payments to women with whom he had allegedly had sexual dalliances years before. But that was never seriously in dispute. Trump's lawyer conceded as much during his opening statement.
Remember that the crime here is not payment of hush money. It's falsification of business records around those payments to evade campaign finance laws. The crime, in other words, lies in the accounting behind the hush money payments. And Cohen's tape cast doubt on a central element that the prosecution must prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump,
was involved in the fraudulent scheme to structure the reimbursements to Cohen to make the hush money payments look like legal expenses. So let's set the scene for Cohen's recording of Trump. It's September 2016, two months before the election. And Michael Cohen decides, for reasons that remain unclear but surely will be explored in depth when he testifies, he decides to record a phone call with Trump without Trump's knowledge.
While it wasn't illegal for Cohen to record his client, it was bizarre and it was brazenly unethical. Ask any defense lawyer whether he's ever secretly recorded a client and watch him respond like you've just asked whether he ever ate a banana with the peel on. He'll be more confused than offended. Why would anyone do that?
Perhaps tellingly, Cohen never voluntarily came forward with the recording. Rather, the FBI seized it from his office when they executed a search warrant in 2018. Any plausible explanation here will hurt Cohen's credibility as a witness.
Did he secretly record other clients, too? Did he tape conversations with Trump beyond this one? If so, did he preserve them or delete them? Any claim by Cohen that he was playing the good cop and trying to catch Trump in the act, that won't fly. Cohen stayed by Trump's side and continued to do his bidding for nearly another two years before he flipped in 2018 after the FBI search.
Now, the September 2016 call begins with Trump talking to somebody offline about unrelated business. When Trump turns his attention to the call, Cohen opens up with, "'Great poll, by the way.'" It's jarring now, given Cohen's all-consuming public hatred for Trump, to recall a time when Cohen was an eager sycophant, yelping giddily about any snippet of good news for the boss man.
Cohen quickly raises the then-ongoing effort to pay off former Playboy model Karen McDougal to catch and kill her story, to buy the rights and then bury the story, that is. The McDougal payoff, by the way, is not charged in the indictment, but the judges ruled that the DA can introduce it as evidence to support the charged crimes, which center on a separate but similar scheme to pay off Stormy Daniels.
Now, Cohen explains to Trump on the tape that, quote, I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend David, you know, so that I'm going to do that right away. And I've spoken to Alan Weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with dot, dot, dot.
Now, David, of course, means David Pecker, who was the DA's first witness at trial. He was the chair of AMI, the company that published the National Enquirer, and he worked closely with Trump and Cohen to execute the catch and kill strategy. Weisselberg is the longtime Trump Organization chief financial officer currently behind bars for committing perjury in the Trump org civil fraud trial earlier this year.
Now, read or listen to Cohen's words again and ask, who exactly set up the accounting behind the hush money payments? Remember, the crime is not the payment. It's the structuring of those payments to make them look like legal fees.
On the recording, Cohen, the lawyer, explains to Trump, the client that he's spoken with Weisselberg, the CFO, quote, about how to set the whole thing up, end quote. Now, Trump is characteristically disinterested in the nuances. He cuts Cohen off with a bottom line question. So what do we got to pay for this? $150,000?
Now, Trump obviously knows about and agrees to make the payments for $150, but importantly, Cohen never actually explains to Trump on the tape how the payments will be structured. All Cohen says is that he and Weisselberg will, quote, set the whole thing up. Moments later, after some irrelevant crosstalk, this exchange happens. I'm all over that. And I spoke to Alan about it when it comes time for the financing, which will be... What financing? We'll have to...
Once again, the dynamic is apparent. Trump is fine with paying McDougal to ensure her silence, but Cohen is the one handling the mechanics and the internal accounting behind those payments. If anything, Trump seems a bit clueless.
It's unclear whether Trump suggests they pay by cash or by check. Either way, Cohen has something more complicated in mind, the financing, as he puts it. And when Trump suggests a straightforward one-time payment, pay with cash, likely meaning pay up front without financing, as a former Trump lawyer has reasonably explained, Cohen blows him off in favor of something more complicated. Quote, no, no, no, no, no, I got it, end quote.
Now, this, folks, is a problem for prosecutors. Sure, they'll advocate for a more favorable interpretation of the call. They'll argue that the tape shows that Trump knew about the McDougal hush money payments, which he did, and that he spoke with Cohen about how to make those payments. But the tape makes plain that when it came to how those payments would be structured, transmitted, and internally logged, the actual crime charged with respect to the Stormy Daniels payments, Cohen and Weisselberg led the way with Trump dimly apprised, if at all.
The DA's case has come in smoothly so far, and it remains more likely than not that the jury will find Trump guilty. But I assure you, prosecutors wish Cohen had never hit record on that call with his own client. Even if Cohen's secret recording is a stalemate of sorts, even if it cuts both ways, helps and hurts both sides in some measure, that's a problem for prosecutors. They're the ones who have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. As we prosecutors would sometimes say, if you're explaining, you're losing.
Thanks for listening, everyone. Stay safe and stay informed.
On September 28th, the Global Citizen Festival will gather thousands of people who took action to end extreme poverty. Watch Post Malone, Doja Cat, Lisa, Jelly Roll, and Raul Alejandro as they take the stage with world leaders and activists to defeat poverty, defend the planet, and demand equity. Download the Global Citizen app to watch live. Learn more at globalcitizen.org.com.
