Chapters
Shownotes Transcript
There's nothing worse than getting home from your trip only to find out you missed a can't-miss travel experience. That's why you need Viator. Book guided tours, excursions, and more in one place to make your trip truly unregrettable. There are over 300,000 travel experiences to choose from so you can find something for everyone. And Viator offers free cancellation and 24-7 customer service. So you always have support around the clock.
Download the Viator app now to use code VIATOR10 for 10% off your first booking in the app. Regret less. Do more with Viator. Hey, everyone. Ellie here wishing you a happy Friday. Another eventful week in the legal news. This time we're looking ahead to what looks like it's going to be the very first criminal trial of Donald Trump, and it's not far away. I want to draw attention to what I think is going to be a very interesting dynamic in that trial.
Also, on March 5th, if you happen to live in or near Washington, D.C., I'm going to be doing an event along with Katie Fang, who many of you know is an anchor over at MSNBC. Katie and I are going to be arguing on stage at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre the case of Lady Macbeth versus Macbeth. It is the annual mock trial, although this is more of an appellate argument.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett will be presiding over the argument, along with a panel of four highly esteemed and intimidating federal judges from Washington, D.C. and elsewhere. So I'm going to be representing Lady Macbeth, who did nothing wrong. Katie is going to be representing Macbeth, the guy who did all the killing. But definitely check it out. Shakespeare Theater in Washington, D.C. Get your tickets. We'll be there.
sort of mingling with the crowd before and after. And it'll be really fun, and you'll get to see me get grilled by an esteemed panel of judges. Okay, on with this week's brief. As always, thanks for your questions, comments, and thoughts. Keep them coming to lettersatcafe.com.
The first criminal trial of a former U.S. president is really, truly, actually happening, and soon, 31 days from now to be precise. Judge Juan Merchan has denied the defendant's last-ditch request for a postponement, and now it's on. March 25th, downtown Manhattan, state of New York versus Donald John Trump.
But the pivotal player at trial will not be Trump himself. Allow me to gaze into my crystal ball of the obvious and foretell that Trump will feign like he might take the stand, but then play it safe and give it a pass. Instead, the center of attention at trial will be the former president's former fixer, Michael Cohen.
First, a disclosure. Cohen and I are friends. I like him. I've been on air with him, and I've done his podcast several times. Our conversations tend to sound like two aggressive cousins jawing at each other. I'll tell him directly why he's a flawed witness, though, as we'll discuss shortly, not necessarily fatally flawed, and he'll push right back. I invited him to both of my book launches. He couldn't make the first one because he was finishing his federal sentence on house arrest, a perfectly sound excuse.
But he came to the second.
Turns out I'm naturally drawn to rogues, and they trust me. As an organized crime prosecutor, I built cases on testimony from men who've done far worse things than Michael Cohen ever dreamt of. I've stayed in touch with some of them, and we've built relationships that now extend beyond our careers as prosecutors or gangsters. If you've listened to my other podcast, Up Against the Mob, you've heard me catch up with some of them. A colleague asked me recently if I added up the number of murders committed by all the people in my phone contacts...
How many would that be? I did some basic math and I came up with 11, not counting attempts and conspiracies. That'd be more. So I'm no pearl clutcher when it comes to putting a convicted felon on the witness stand. When Cohen testifies in the upcoming Trump trial, he'll be the prosecution's most important witness and he'll present an especially tricky case. Another disclosure here, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg is also a friend and a former colleague. I don't know what to tell you. It's a small world.
On paper, Cohen is an absurdly easy target for cross-examination. Ideally, prosecutors want a witness with no axe to grind. I once had a cooperator testify that he still loved the defendant and hoped he would beat our case, and that was good testimony for us.
But Michael Cohen has built his public profile largely on his visceral and at times unhinged hatred for his former boss. Cohen has publicly called Trump, and you have to pardon me here because I'm quoting, batshit crazy, the owner of a, quote, mushroom pecker. And again, sorry, I'm just quoting him, quote, Donald Von shits and pants, end quote.
In one machine gun rant from his memoir, Cohen calls Trump, quote, a cheat, a liar, a fraud, a bully, a racist, a predator, a con man. Cohen is so at ease with his feelings that in a perverse sense, he actually bolsters his own credibility. At least he's deadly honest about where he stands.
Honesty has not, of course, been a traditional Cohen hallmark. We're all familiar with his past life when he was a growling, bare-knuckled, taxicab-medallion lawyer turned Trump enforcer. The end result? Cohen pled guilty and served time at the Otisville Federal Correctional Institute for crimes including lying to Congress, tax fraud, bank fraud, and campaign finance fraud, that last one for the same hush money payments at issue in the upcoming trial.
Meanwhile, Trump skated until his 2023 indictments, at least with the final results still undetermined. Because of Cohen's history, prosecutors unavoidably must ask the jury to believe a star witness who has a long track record of lying. The defense attack will be simple and compelling. He's a proven liar who took that same oath before and broke it. How can you believe him now?
It'll be the Manhattan DA's job to convince the jury that Cohen has now come clean. We can all understand the basic character arc here. Trump's lying lawyer saw the light, admitted his conduct, paid the price, and now has gone straight.
But it's not quite that simple. It never is with Michael Cohen. He pled guilty to tax fraud for conduct relating solely to his own finances. So the DA can't argue that he only ever committed crimes for Donald Trump. Worse, Cohen now claims that when he took that guilty plea in 2018, he actually was not guilty. And he lied again under oath when he told a federal judge that he had committed tax fraud. Stay with me here. It's Michael Cohen. It's a tangled web.
And Cohen recently got mixed up in a bizarre incident in which he gave fake AI-generated legal citations to his personal lawyer, who then submitted them to a court. Cohen has said this was an accident, and I believe him, but the incident could provide more ammo for cross-examination.
Now, prosecutors and Cohen got some mostly good news last week. The state judge presiding over the New York attorney general's civil fraud lawsuit against Trump credited Cohen's testimony in that trial, which yielded a galactic verdict of over $350 million against Trump and his businesses.
Judge Arthur N. Gorin found that Cohen's testimony was, quote, significantly compromised, end quote, by his extensive rap sheet and by, quote, seeming contradictions in what he said at trial, end quote. That part would really worry me as a prosecutor. But the judge concluded that overall, Cohen's testimony was credible, given his mannerism in the witness box and the independent corroborating evidence.
Corroboration is the key here. Prosecutors are obsessed with finding evidence that might support a dicey witness like Cohen. I once did a case where the cooperator mentioned offhand that he'd occasionally go to the supermarket with the defendant. Those trips had nothing to do with the charged crimes, but we subpoenaed the supermarket's surveillance video anyway. I'll put you out of your suspense. We did find footage of the two men bagging up their groceries together, but we didn't use it at trial because, well, it was pointless.
That's how far prosecutors will go to find evidence that supports a cooperating witness. Cohen has claimed publicly that his testimony at the upcoming Trump trial will be heavily corroborated by independent evidence and documents. Indeed, we know there are a series of checks, some signed by Trump himself, that were paid to Cohen to reimburse him for making the hush money payments to the silence-ee, the adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
Now, that's important evidence for prosecutors, of course, but it doesn't quite provide the vital external support that Cohen's testimony requires. It's important here to understand the precise charges facing Trump. He's not charged with paying hush money. That's seedy, but not illegal. The crime here is falsifying business records. Specifically, prosecutors allege, Trump mislabeled those payments as legal fees.
The payments aren't the crime. It's the booking of those payments. And on that point, there's no known document that directly ties Trump himself to the internal accounting. Trump will argue that he left that part up to his attorney, Cohen, and to the accountants, as top executives often do. It'll largely come down to Cohen's word standing alone to rebut that defense.
When Michael Cohen takes the stand, it'll be a moment of truth for him and for his former client. Prosecutors must convince the jury to credit Cohen, and the verdict likely will follow accordingly. Personally, I believe Michael, for the most part. I don't think he fabricates. Not anymore. He does tend to add a little oomph here and there, and his emotions can drive and color his perception.
Cohen makes me roll my eyes sometimes, but I trust him at bottom. The question now is whether 12 randomly chosen Manhattanites will feel the same. Thanks for listening, everyone. Stay safe and stay informed.
On September 28th, the Global Citizen Festival will gather thousands of people who took action to end extreme poverty. Watch Post Malone, Doja Cat, Lisa, Jelly Roll and Raul Alejandro as they take the stage with world leaders and activists to defeat poverty, defend the planet and demand equity. Download the Global Citizen app to watch live. Learn more at globalcitizen.org.com.
